Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
02/07/2022

Request for a Protective Measure to Be Taken About the Child

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

The Protection Measures Taken About Their Children
The Law on the Protection of Children
Article 7- (1) Protective and supportive measure decision about children; mother of the child,
the father, the guardian, the person responsible for the care and supervision, Social Services and Child Protection
It can be taken at the request of the institution and the Public prosecutor or by the juvenile judge if necessary.
(2) A social examination may be made about the child before the injunction is issued.
(3) The type of the measure shall be indicated in the decision. One or more measures may be decided upon.
(4) The inspection of the child in which the judge has decided on a protective and supportive measure
he can also decide whether to take it under himself.
(5) The judge is protective and supportive, taking into account the development of the child
he can decide on the abolition or amendment of the measure. If this decision is made in a hurry, the child
the location can also be given by the judge. But in this case, the decision is made by the person who took the previous decision
it is notified to the judge or court.
(6) The implementation of the measure ends spontaneously upon reaching the age of eighteen.
However, in order for the judge to continue his education and training and with his consent, the measure
he may decide to continue its implementation for a certain period of time.
(7) The Court shall take protective and supportive measures against the child in need of protection
according to the provisions of the Turkish Civil Code dated 22.11.2001 and numbered 4721, in addition to the decision
to make decisions on custody, guardianship, custody, alimony and personal relationship establishment
it is authorized.

TO THE JUVENILE COURT

REQUESTING A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE :

 

attorney :

ISSUE : 5395 P. K. m. 7 it is our request that a precautionary decision be made about the child in accordance with the warning.

descriptions :

1-) Our client …. ….. ‘s …… ….. name …/…/…. Date, ……. He has a son who was born in Yer (October 1). About our client’s son …./… E. in file No. 2, it was decided that there is no place for the prosecution of the minor due to the fact that he was not over the age of 12 at the time of the crime (October 2).

2-) The client’s wife passed away while their children were still very young. Therefore, she tries to provide for the care of her child on her own. However, she has a very difficult time meeting both the needs of the house and the care and expenses of her child alone. He wants to complete the education of his child and have a good profession, but he thinks that he cannot afford it within his means. Although the little one is not yet 12 years old, he is very influenced by his friends in the environment where he lives, although he is not actually in a personality structure that will commit a crime, he is very influenced by his environment and friends.

3-) of the Minor Child Protection Act to have a child who has committed a crime as defined in our client’s economic problems over a good care of your child until you get a good education for the provision of the minor to be under cover the costs of maintenance of and, if necessary, be placed in a boarding school or a home and protection for little reasons to want to be placed in protection has become necessary in order to make a decision about.

LEGAL REASONS : 5395 P. 5, 7.

LEGAL EVIDENCE : 1– Sample Population Registration

2- …./…. E. …./…. K. ruling

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: We sincerely request on behalf of our client that the necessary actions be taken to make a protection decision about the minor for the reasons described above. …/…/

APPENDICES: October– Sample of Population Registration.

2- …./…. E. …./…. K. Ruling.

3- An Example of a Certified Power of Attorney

The Deputy Who Asked for the Measure

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Appeal against the Decision to Merge Appeal against the Penalty for the Revocation of the Driver’s License Petition

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us