Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
10/09/2022

An Example of a Petition for a Lawsuit for an Objection of Authority to the Enforcement Court

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

BAKIRKÖY ( ) TO THE JUDGE OF THE EXECUTIVE CIVIL COURT

ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE and FILE NO:

Bakirkoy…. Executive Directorate 2015/….. E.

PLAINTIFF /DEBTOR :…………………………. (TC. ID Number: …)

attorney :

Address :

DEFENDANT/CREDITOR :

Address :

SUBJECT OF REQUEST: Authority is our objection.

descriptions

Bakırköy ( ) Executive Directorate of 2015 /….. E. The payment order regarding the execution proceedings related to the bills of exchange initiated against the client from the numbered file is paid to the client …./……/Having been notified on 2015, we object to the authority within the legal period (5 days).

My Client, ………………. K.He is residing at Çekmece / Istanbul Address and, as will be seen when the execution file is examined, the address specified in the follow-up request by the creditor and the notification made to my client is K.The address of the drawer.

The location of the check subject to follow-up is Istanbul, and the authorized enforcement offices in relation to this check are Istanbul or K.The Drawer is the Executive Directorates.

The defendant / creditor’s Istanbul or K.Although the drawer has the right to choose to initiate follow-up in the enforcement directorates, the follow-up has been initiated in the unauthorized Bakırköy Enforcement Directorates.

Without reserving our right to object to the debt, signature, interest and all other ferries of the debt, it has become necessary to request that a decision be made on the acceptance of our objection to the authority.

LEGAL REASONS : EBL, TCC, HMK other legal regulations

CONCLUSION-I DEMAND: For the reasons explained above and supply,

With the acceptance of our authority objection, Bakırköy …. The lack of authority of the Executive Directorate,

Cancellation of the follow-up initiated in the unauthorized enforcement directorate,

For the subject of the follow-up, K.To determine that the Drawer Enforcement Directorates are authorized,

I respectfully request by proxy that the decision be made to transfer the costs and fees of the trial to the defendant…./…../

 

Plaintiff Attorney

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

An Example of a Request to Issue a Certificate of Authority for the Debtor to Issue a Probate Order Transfer of Claim Agreement

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us