Uncategorized @tr

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

T.C. SUPREME 18. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT MAIN NUMBER:2015/2372 DECISION NO:2015/12784 DECISION DATE: 07.12.2015 >C. THE AUTHORITY TO DISRUPT THE DECISION NOT TO FOLLOW THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW- INSULTS AND THREATS-APPRECIATION ABSTRACT: In the letter of the request; “160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271. “as soon as the public […]

T.C. SUPREME COURT 22. Legal Department Main Number: 2015/16933 Decision No:2017/19050 Decision Date: 25.09.2017 Supreme Court Decision COURT: Labor Court CASE TYPE: RECEIVABLE It was understood that the decision made as a result of the case between the parties was requested by the plaintiff’s attorney to be examined on appeal, and that the appeal request […]

T.C. SUPREME COURT 22. Legal Department Main Number: 2018/6283 Decision No:2018/10735 Decision Date: 04.05.2018 EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES CASE – THE SUBJECT OF THE CASE IS COMPENSATION AND TECHNICAL AND EXPERTISE OF THE CALCULATION OF RECEIVABLES DOES NOT REQUIRE – ADVANCE PAYMENT FOR THE SUBSTITUTION OF EVIDENCE – OF THE CASE SINCE IT CANNOT BE PROVED, THE […]

T.C. SUPREME 13. Legal Department Main No:2014/19529 Decision No: 2014/20906 Decision Date: 24.06.2014 SUPREME COURT DECISION COURT: Şereflikoçhisar 1. The Court Of First Instance DATE: 29/01/2013 NUMBER: 2011/180-2013/76 At the end of the trial of the receivable case between the parties, the file was examined upon the appeal of the defendants’ lawyer within the period […]

ALANYA 1.TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT; DEFENDANT : TC No: THE DEFENDER : DATE AND DATE OF DECISION : SUBJECT : Our Objections to the Decision of Rejection of Our Request for Renewal of the Trial. OUR EXPLANATIONS 1-) My client has been sentenced to a one-year prison sentence for his crime […]