T.C. SUPREME 22. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2015/16933 DECISION NO: 2017/19050 DECISION DATE: 25.9.2017 >>IF THE WOMAN WORKER GIVING BIRTH IS NOT ALLOWED TO USE THE “MILK LEAVE”, SHE CAN REQUEST A 50% INCREASE IN THE MILK LEAVE FEE It was understood that the decision made as a result of the case between the parties […]

T.C. SUPREME 9.law office Basis: 2015/7967 Verdict: 2017/2059 Decision Date: 16.02.2017 EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES CASE – THE RELEASE AGREEMENT HAS THE PLAINTIFF’S SIGNATURE – THE SIGNATURE IS NOT DENIED BY THE PLAINTIFF – THE WILL-CRIPPLING SITUATIONS ARE NOT PRESENT IN THE CONCRETE CASE – DUE TO THE REJECTION OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE RECEIVABLES […]

T.C. SUPREME 8.law office Basis: 2017/16734 Verdict: 2018/252 Decision Date: 11.01.2018 REFUSAL OF THE FAMILY BOND LAWSUIT – THE ONE-YEAR REDUCTION PERIOD WILL BEGIN AS OF THE DATE OF LEARNING – DOUBT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT IN TERMS OF LEARNING – IT MUST BE ACCEPTED THAT THE CASE WAS OPENED WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT – […]

T.C. SUPREME 20. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/9857 DECISION NO: 2017/9650 DECISION DATE: 20.11.2017 >>THE COMPETENT PLACE FOR THE OBJECTION TO THE APPRAISAL IS THE EXECUTIVE CIVIL COURT. SUMMARY: The competent Executive Civil Court for the objection to the valuation discretion.. if the valuation has been made by another Enforcement Directorate by means of an […]

T.C SUPREME 4. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/3553 DECISION NO:1561 DECISION DATE: 06.03.2018 >>TERMINATION OF THE TENDER, THE DECISION TO ARRANGE THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE LATE DELIVERY OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY DUE TO THE TERMINATION OF THE UNFAIR Decommissioning CASE. The plaintiff … Tic.Ltd.Şti. her attorney by the defendant with the petition against unfair […]

T.C. SUPREME 4. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/6461 DECISION NO: 2018/777 DECISION DATE: 12.2.2018 >>REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION ARISING FROM A TORT BETWEEN MERCHANTS – ABSENCE OF THE LEGAL ENTITY OF THE ORDINARY PARTNERSHIP – INCLUSION OF ALL PERSONS FORMING THE PARTNERSHIP IN THE Decease 2004/m.67 ABSTRACT: In an ordinary partnership, since the partnership does not […]

T.C SUPREME 8. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/16895 DECISION NO: 2018/1753 DECISION DATE: 07.02.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Liquidation of the Property Regime >>THE PROPERTY REGIME IS A RIGHT ARISING FROM THE LAW TO PARTICIPATE, AND THE SPOUSE WHO CLAIMS THIS RIGHT DOES NOT NEED TO HAVE INCOME OR CONTRIBUTE TO […]

T.C SUPREME 2.law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/6764 DECISION NO: 2017/6194 DECISION DATE: 25.05.2017 >> EVEN IF THERE IS NO FAMILY HOUSING ANNOTATION, THE TRANSACTION MADE WITHOUT THE EXPLICIT CONSENT OF THE SPOUSE IS INVALID LAWSUIT: At the end of the trial between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, the date and number […]

T.C. SUPREME 9.law office Basis: 2016/36192 Verdict: 2018/998 Decision Date: 23.01.2018 RETURN TO WORK CASE – THE PLAINTIFF HAS WORKED FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS – THE TERMINATION PERFORMED BY THE EMPLOYER IS NOT BASED ON A VALID REASON – THE EMPLOYEE’S SENIORITY AND THE REASON FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT ACCORDING TO THE NON-COMMENCEMENT COMPENSATION […]

Execution Crimes According to the Execution and Bankruptcy Code Enforcement offenses are regulated in the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code. Creditors who cannot collect their receivables from the debtor have the right to collect their receivables forcibly with the help of the state. In order for the forced execution regulated in the Execution and Bankruptcy Code […]