T.C. SUPREME 17.law office Basis: 2017/751 Verdict: 2018/1274 Decision Date: 22.02.2018 LOSS OF VALUE DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT – IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETERMINATION OF THE LOSS OF VALUE LOSS ACCORDING TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE UNDAMAGED USED MARKET FAIR VALUE OF THE VEHICLE BEFORE THE ACCIDENT AND THE FAIR VALUE AFTER THE ACCIDENT […]
Summary: In the sales contract, it should be accepted that the VAT has been paid within the scope of this price together with the sales price, if it is not stated separately and clearly that the sales price does not include VAT; it should be proved by the plaintiff that the opposite (VAT price will […]
SUPREME COURT 17. law office 2016/15663 E. 2017/7899 K. COURT : Court of First Instance At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the parties; the file was examined upon the appeal of the plaintiff’s attorney within the period of the decision on the dismissal of the case for the reasons written […]
T.C SUPREME 2. law office MAIN NUMBER:2016/16526 DECISION NO:2018/5328 DECISION DATE: 19.04.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Mutual Divorce >MUTUAL DIVORCE CASE, THE SPOUSE WHO SAYS THAT HE DOES NOT WANT HIS WIFE IN HIS PRIVATE LIFE AND DOES NOT WANT TO BE TOGETHER IN A SEXUAL SENSE IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED SUMMARY: […]
T.C SUPREME 21. law office MAIN NUMBER:2016/19742 DECISION NO:2018/2740 DECISION DATE: 22.03.2018 COURT : Labor Court > LABOR SERVICE DETERMINATION CASE, THE CASE FILE THAT THEY WILL RECEIVE LABOR IN TERMS OF SERVICE DETERMINATION REQUEST IS IN THE NATURE OF STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT IN THE NATURE OF DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff requested that […]
SUPREME COURT 15. law office 2018/2122 E. 2018/1173 K. Due to the case between the plaintiffs 1-… 2-… and the defendant …, which is the court of first instance Dec. As a result of the appeal application of the Civil Court of First Instance for the decision dated 29.06.2017 and numbered 2016/486-2017/204 … Regional Court […]
T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/11600 DECISION NO: 2018/441 DECISION DATE: 7.2.2018 > SIGNATURE OBJECTION – THE NEED FOR SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE TAKEN IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING – SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE MADE AFTER THE HEARING WITH AN INTERIM Decisioncredit:GETTY – CONTRIBUTOR 2004/m.72 SUMMARY : the plaintiff’s […]
T.C SUPREME 2. law office MAIN NUMBER:2016/16665 DECISION NO:2018/5562 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Divorce >POVERTY ALIMONY IS NOT IMPOSED ON A WOMAN WHO WORKS AND HAS A STEADY INCOME. At the end of the trial between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, the date and […]
T.C SUPREME 2. law office MAIN NUMBER:2016/16661 DECISION NO:2018/5566 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Divorce- Removal of Precautionary Alimony >>THE REMOVAL OF THE PRECAUTIONARY ALIMONY IS NOT AN October OF THE DIVORCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A RELATIVE FEE. CORRESPONDING OPERATIONS CANNOT BE PERFORMED WITHOUT HAVING THE RELATIVE FEE […]
SUPREME COURT 12. law office MAIN NUMBER : 2018/47 DECISION NO : 2018/6880 Regional justice above date and number writing in examination by the plaintiffs requested a decision by the court this term temyizen on work-related files have been sent to the apartment and rested for the audit report to file a claim held […]
