Decision to Block Access – The Decision of the Supreme Court For Fake Facebook – Twitter

7.Criminal Department 2014/5036 E. , 2014/12937 K.

A. In order to remove the username and profile picture contained in the twitter account created with the username @ertemsener on the social networking site Twitter and the fake tweet content contained in this account.. Sh.. Büyükçekmece regarding the rejection of the deputy’s request 1. Regarding the rejection of the objection against the decision of the Criminal Court of Peace dated 29/05/2013 and numbered 2013/1077 amended work, the authority Buyukcekmece 8. High Criminal Court against the decision of the Ministry of Justice dated 12/07/2013 2013/186 different business issued by Law No. 2892 13/01/2014 day and ruining a case file that contains the prompt for the benefit of the public prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court of 24/01/2014 day and KYB. it was read by being given to the apartment with the notification numbered 2014/22872.

The mention is in the notice;

9/1-2 of the Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Publications Made on the Internet and the Fight against Crimes Committed Through These Publications. in the article, “people who claim that rights have been violated due to Content, the content provider, by contacting the provider in case of failure to reach it from the publication, and the publication of its content be removed from the scope of that answer may request that the most prepared for a week be published in the internet. The content or location provider fulfills the request within two days from the date it receives it. If the request is not fulfilled in the envelope of this period, it is considered rejected. In case the request is considered rejected, the person may apply to the settlement magistrate’s criminal court within fifteen days and request that a decision be made to remove the content from publication and publish the answer he has prepared, not more than the scope of the publication, on the Internet for a period of one week. The magistrate judge decides on this request within three days without holding a hearing. An appeal may be filed against the decision of the criminal magistrate judge in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.”taking into account the arrangement in the form of, the username and profile picture contained in the twitter account created with the username @ertemsener and the fake tweet content contained in this account are of a nature that violates the honor and dignity of the person concerned and damages the personal rights, the posts made from the fake twitter account created, as if A..Sh..that it causes an impression as if it belongs to, in the face of the understanding that the user name subject to the complaint was sent to the profile mentioned in the belief that it belongs to the person concerned, there was no success in deciding to reject the objection in writing instead of accepting it, and 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. the need to overturn the said decision in accordance with the article was duly discussed and considered on behalf of the Turkish Nation, having been notified with reference to overturning it in the interest of the law;

Since the content of the notification based on the request of the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation to overturn it in the interest of the law is seen on the spot, Buyukcekmece 8. The date of the Criminal Court of First Instance is 12.07.2013 and 2013/186 D.309 of the business decision of the CMK.it was unanimously decided on 19/06/2014 that the user name on the @ertemsener user account and the profile picture and tweet contents on the twitter account should be changed in accordance with the article.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.