Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
24/12/2022

How To Remove Content And Block Access Due To Violation Of Personal Rights

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

How to Remove Content and Block Access Due to Violation of Personal Rights?

9/1 of the Law No. 5651.according to the article, videos, images, news, comments, etc. of a size that will violate someone’s personal rights. if the content is published on the internet, the person whose personal right is violated may request that the content be removed or access blocked.

Although every attack on personal rights is covered by a tort, but not every tort constitutes a crime. Even if it does not constitute a crime, a decision may be made to block access due to any violation of personal rights made via internet broadcasting.

The court in charge of this matter, the court in charge of making the decision to block access to content due to violation of personal rights, 9/1 of Law No. 5651.according to the article, the Judge is a Criminal Judge.

On the other hand, the competent court is the Criminal Judges of Peace authorized to make a decision on the removal of content and blocking access due to violation of personal rights, if the website has a known central address in Turkey, the Criminal Judge of Peace at this address is 12/5 of the Law No. 5271.according to the article, the place of residence and residence of the victim, the Criminal Court of Peace is also authorized to make a decision on blocking access.

Decisions to block access made by the Criminal Judges of Peace are sent directly to the Association of Access Providers. In accordance with the decision to block access to the content sent by the Union to the access provider, access is fulfilled by the access provider no later than within 4 hours.

The Criminal Magistrates’ Courts shall decide the application without holding a hearing within 24 hours at the latest due to the violation of personal rights. An appeal may be filed against this decision in accordance with the provisions set out in Law No. 5271.

9/9 of the Law No. 5651.in the event that the publication regarding the violation of the personal right subject to the decision of the Criminal Justice of Peace to block access is published at other internet addresses not included in the decision, the current decision is also applied to these addresses if the relevant person applies to the Association of Access Providers.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

How Can Content And Publication Be Removed In Case of Violation Of Personal Rights Without Applying To the Court Content from the Internet (Video, Photo, News, Comments, etc.) What Are the Conditions For Removing And Blocking Access

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us