Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
24/12/2022

Law No. 5651 Prevention of Attack Detection of Content Removal Petition

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE OF THE PEACE

Complaining

attorney :

Suspect : Unsolved

SUBJECT : The determination of the illegality of the attack on our client via the Internet consists of our request to stop and remove the publication.

 

descriptions

 

1-) The photograph taken in close-up while the client was meeting with his close friends …./…/…. It has been published on various sites on the Internet in its history, through the company that the client and his friends are working on “… A.Sh. he makes these things work..”with the accusations in the form of, shares were made for the company where the clients work.

2-)As a result … A.Sh. they were dismissed by. The client is a person who has responsibility in business life and is a loved one in his immediate environment. Alcoholism is an excessive passion for alcoholic beverages in a way that harms a person’s physical and psychological health, and the fact that the client drinks one or two drinks while going out to dinner with close friends is referred to as alcoholism is contrary to reality, it is clearly an attack on the client’s personal rights. For this reason, the fact that the client has been dismissed also has irreparable consequences for the client.

3-) The client has been clearly victimized by the news that is an attack on the client’s private life and personal rights in a way that is easily accessible on the Internet. In this regard, Article 24 of the TMK No. 4721 regulates that a person whose personal rights are being attacked unlawfully may request protection from a judge against those who commit the attack.

4-) In the Internet environment ……with the publication made from the website, the respected personality of the client has been compromised. About this illegal publication …/…/….on the date of the application to the hosting provider, the content related to the client was requested to be removed from the publication, but our application was not responded to within 2 days after the request reached the hosting provider, and the publication was not removed from the relevant website. (October-3)

5-) With the removal of the publication containing unfair and untrue statements about the client from the Internet, it should be decided to publish the answer prepared by us on the Internet for a week in order to prevent damage to the client’s reputation.

6-) Due to the above-mentioned issues, we have been obliged to apply to your Honorable Court with the determination of the illegality of the attack made via the Internet, the request to stop and remove the publication.

 

LEGAL REASONS : 5651 P. K. m. 9, 9/A, 5237 P. K. m. 134, 4721 P. K. m. 24, 25, Regulation on the Procedures and Principles for the Regulation of Publications Made on the Internet, m. 10

 

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

1-) Photocopies of related website images

2-) Sample of the application petition made to the website hosting provider

3-) The witness list shows the names and addresses of the witnesses and the topics they will testify about

4-) Expert Examination.

 

CONCLUSION AND CLAIM : For the reasons we have explained above, in the concrete incident, our client’s personal right is clearly violated “……….. we respectfully request on behalf of our client to determine the illegality of the attack made via the Internet on the website called ”com”, to stop the publication and to decide on its removal. …/…/…

 

ADDITIONAL :

1-) Photocopies of related website images

2-) News clippings related to various newspapers.

3-) Sample of the application petition made to the website hosting provider

4-) The witness list shows the names and addresses of the witnesses and the topics they will testify about

5-) One approved power of attorney sample.

 

 

The Requesting Deputy

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Content from the Internet (Video, Photo, News, Comments, etc.) What Are the Conditions For Removing And Blocking Access Law No. 5651 Determination of the Illegality of the Attack Made Via the Internet, Petition For the Suspension and Cancellation of the Publication

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us