Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
04/02/2023

Objection to the Decision of Refusal of the Request for Renewal of the Trial

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

ALANYA 1.TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT;

DEFENDANT : TC No:

THE DEFENDER :

DATE AND DATE OF DECISION :

SUBJECT : Our Objections to the Decision of Rejection of Our Request for Renewal of the Trial.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) My client has been sentenced to a one-year prison sentence for his crime by the decision of your court mentioned above, the decision has been approved and finalized by the decision of the Criminal Department numbered … /… Main and … / … Decision.

2-) to the European Court of human rights against the provision we made …/…/… reference dated …/…/… concluded by the European Court of human rights and the criminal provision 6 of the convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. it has been determined that it was given by violating the article.

3-a) Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure No. 5271/f in accordance to our client’s re-tried with the prompt that should be …/ …/ … we have provided the retrial of the voluntary petition in history to the Criminal Court, the decision by the European Court of human rights kesinlesme the history of …/ …/ … and the law has passed from the procedure of looking for a year’s time with the justification that she was rejected.

4-) The date of finalization of the decision issued by the European Court of Human Rights is … / … / …, and this date can be easily determined from the page of the relevant decision …. Due to the fact that it was decided to reject our request to renew the trial on the grounds that it is illegal and premature, it has become necessary to apply to your court with this lawsuit petition.

EVIDENCE : The decision of the ECTHR … /… dated … /… /… numbered Main, 5271 p. K. m. 311.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST : We respectfully request on behalf of our client that, with the acceptance of my objection to the decision to reject our request for renewal of the trial, the decision to hold a retrial by accepting the reasons for renewal of the trial sought by the law, the decision to acquit the client by removing the conviction, the decision to annul the verdict to be published in the Official Gazette be decided. …/…/…

Defense of the Accused

Lawyer.

Request for Renewal of the Trial The Bride Price Will Not Be Asked Back

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

Aşıkoğlu Law ™ International Law Office