Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
04/02/2023

Petition for Objection to the Decision on the Continuation of the State of Detention

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

BURSA 3.TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT

FILE NO: …/… E.

suspect :

THE DEFENDER :

SUBJECT : … Contains our objections to the Decision of the Assize Court …/…/…on the Continuation of the daily Detention, consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) It has been decided to arrest our client at the hearing of the public lawsuit filed against him on the date of … / … / … with the file numbered …/ … E of your court about our client.

2-) Our client; As he owns a fixed place of residence, the house in which he lives also belongs to him. The client has been practicing his farming profession since childhood, and before his arrest, he carried out the October process in his field. In addition to the fact that there is no one who can take care of his field other than himself, the harvest time of the crops has come, the products that have not been harvested will perish, and the client and his family will be in an extremely difficult economic situation. In addition, he has not been involved in any crime so far and does not have any negative records in his criminal record. It is obvious that there is no suspicion of escape.

3-) Although our client, who is a suspect in the related crime alone, does not have any other accomplice who is a suspect; all the evidence related to the crime has been collected and kept. For this reason, there is no suspicion of our client blacking out the evidence.

4-) The witnesses also gave their statements to both the law enforcement and the Public Prosecutor’s Office during the preparatory investigation, and there were no question marks about the investigation stage.

5-) Considering the nature and elements of the crime and in any case, according to the contents of the file, there is no reason to decide on the continuation of the state of detention imposed on our client with a fixed residence, who has no criminal record.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST : … We respectfully request bilvekale on behalf of our client to decide on the release of our client with the acceptance of our objection to the Assize Court’s decision on the continuation of his daily detention. …/…/…

Defense of the Accused

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Having the Children Whose Alimony is Ruled in Their Favor with the Creditor Request for Review of the State of Detention

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us