Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
04/02/2023

Request for Review of the State of Detention

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

TO THE MANAVGAT CRIMINAL COURT OF PEACE,

Query File No : …/…

suspicious :

THE DEFENDER :

DATE OF ARREST :

SUBJECT : 5271 P. K. m. according to Article 108/2, the review of the state of detention includes our request and consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) Our client is a suspect, …/…/….. on his date, he was arrested in accordance with the arrest warrant issued through the interrogation file of your court, the number of which is indicated above.

2-) The client divorced his wife on the date of … / … /…, the custody of the joint child born from this marriage is on the client. The joint child … is not in a position to meet his needs on his own because he is old. Considering the criminal record of his ex-wife, it is very inconvenient for him to even approach, let alone father the child. It is very important for the child to get mother’s love and care as soon as possible, to prevent the traumas he will experience in the future and to be able to maintain his life under normal conditions. It is obvious that there is no suspicion of the client’s escape. In addition, all the evidence related to the crime has been collected and placed under preservation. For this reason, there is no suspicion of our client blacking out the evidence.

3-) The witnesses also gave their statements to both the law enforcement and the Public Prosecutor’s Office during the preparatory investigation. There is no action left to be taken regarding the investigation phase.

4-) It has become necessary to apply to your Court with this petition for the review of the detention decision issued against our client, who has no criminal record and has a fixed residence.

LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 108

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST : For the reasons we have tried to explain above, we respectfully request bilvekale on behalf of our client to decide on the review of the arrest decision against our client’s suspect. …/…/…

Suspicious Defender

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Petition for Objection to the Decision on the Continuation of the State of Detention Request to Appeal the Arrest Decision

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us