Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
04/02/2023

Request to Appeal the Arrest Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

SERIK TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE OF PEACE,

Query File No : …/…

TO THE ARREST DECISION

OBJECTING SUSPECT : TC No:

THE DEFENDER :

DATE OF ARREST :

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) My client is a suspect, …/…/….. on his date, he was arrested in accordance with the arrest warrant issued through the interrogation file of your court, the number of which is indicated above.

2-) Taking into account the statements of my client and the evidence available in the file, my client, in accordance with the provisions of the … Turkish Penal Code .. it will be clearly seen that the material and moral elements of his crime were not formed.

3-) Moreover, for the arrest of my client, 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedures No. 5271. the conditions stipulated in the article have not been formed either. Firstly, there is no ‘strong suspicion’ that the act in question was carried out by my client. In addition, my client is a businessman who owns a workplace, has a family and a fixed residence, is a well-known person around. Nor is he in a position to make an attempt to escape and/or eliminate or hide evidence during the investigation phase.

4-) For the reasons explained, there has been a need to object to the said arrest decision with this petition.

LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 100, 101.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST : For the reasons we have tried to explain above, we request by proxy that the arrest warrant against my client, the suspect, be lifted and a decision be made to release him. …/…/…

Suspicious Defender

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Request for Review of the State of Detention Request for Renewal of the Trial

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us