T.C. SUPREME 20. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/9857 DECISION NO: 2017/9650 DECISION DATE: 20.11.2017 >>THE COMPETENT PLACE FOR THE OBJECTION TO THE APPRAISAL IS THE EXECUTIVE CIVIL COURT. SUMMARY: The competent Executive Civil Court for the objection to the valuation discretion.. if the valuation has been made by another Enforcement Directorate by means of an […]
T.C SUPREME 4. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/3553 DECISION NO:1561 DECISION DATE: 06.03.2018 >>TERMINATION OF THE TENDER, THE DECISION TO ARRANGE THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE LATE DELIVERY OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY DUE TO THE TERMINATION OF THE UNFAIR Decommissioning CASE. The plaintiff … Tic.Ltd.Şti. her attorney by the defendant with the petition against unfair […]
T.C. SUPREME 4. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/6461 DECISION NO: 2018/777 DECISION DATE: 12.2.2018 >>REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION ARISING FROM A TORT BETWEEN MERCHANTS – ABSENCE OF THE LEGAL ENTITY OF THE ORDINARY PARTNERSHIP – INCLUSION OF ALL PERSONS FORMING THE PARTNERSHIP IN THE Decease 2004/m.67 ABSTRACT: In an ordinary partnership, since the partnership does not […]
T.C SUPREME 8. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2017/16895 DECISION NO: 2018/1753 DECISION DATE: 07.02.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Liquidation of the Property Regime >>THE PROPERTY REGIME IS A RIGHT ARISING FROM THE LAW TO PARTICIPATE, AND THE SPOUSE WHO CLAIMS THIS RIGHT DOES NOT NEED TO HAVE INCOME OR CONTRIBUTE TO […]
T.C SUPREME 2.law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/6764 DECISION NO: 2017/6194 DECISION DATE: 25.05.2017 >> EVEN IF THERE IS NO FAMILY HOUSING ANNOTATION, THE TRANSACTION MADE WITHOUT THE EXPLICIT CONSENT OF THE SPOUSE IS INVALID LAWSUIT: At the end of the trial between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, the date and number […]
T.C. SUPREME 9.law office Basis: 2016/36192 Verdict: 2018/998 Decision Date: 23.01.2018 RETURN TO WORK CASE – THE PLAINTIFF HAS WORKED FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS – THE TERMINATION PERFORMED BY THE EMPLOYER IS NOT BASED ON A VALID REASON – THE EMPLOYEE’S SENIORITY AND THE REASON FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT ACCORDING TO THE NON-COMMENCEMENT COMPENSATION […]
Execution Crimes According to the Execution and Bankruptcy Code Enforcement offenses are regulated in the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code. Creditors who cannot collect their receivables from the debtor have the right to collect their receivables forcibly with the help of the state. In order for the forced execution regulated in the Execution and Bankruptcy Code […]
The Crime of Execution and Bankruptcy- Withdrawal without Increasing To Benefit In the crime of withdrawing from an increase in order to provide benefits, a person who does not participate in the increase in exchange for a promise to provide benefits or benefits provided to him or someone else in tenders, or withdraws later from […]
Execution and Bankruptcy Crime – Kidnapping of the Goods on Which the Lessor Has the Right to Imprisonment and Making Someone Else Occupy the Place That Needs to be Evacuated Kidnapping of goods on which the lessor has the right to imprisonment, having someone else occupy the place that needs to be evacuated; As clearly […]
Execution and Bankruptcy Crime – The Crime of Reducing the Existence of a Person Who has the Authority to Manage a Commercial Company with the Intention of Putting His Creditor at a Loss Another of the issues of execution crimes is the crime of reducing its existence with the intention of harming its creditor. It […]