Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
24/12/2022

The Court Charged in the Case of the First-Time Collection of the Compensation Paid by the Traffic Insurer is the Commercial Court of First Instance. Supreme Court Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Summary:

In order for a legal transaction or act to be recognized as remaining within the scope of the Turkish Commercial Code, there must be a legal transaction or act related to a commercial enterprise with the issues regulated in this law, the definitions of which are given above, within the purpose of the law.

 

T.C.
SUPREME
17. law office
Main Number:2013/16531
Decision No:2013/15062
K. Date:5.11.2013

The plaintiff’s attorney, the defendant is insured with a liability insurance policy to the client company belonging to the tool as a result of accident involving the vehicle to the plaintiff even damaged vehicle that has liability insurance, automobile insurance liability insurance policy from your insurance policy, you will get paid for the amount of the damaged vehicle that is saved from the defendant, the driver of the vehicle belonging to the cause of the accident due to a drunk that was born of the right of recourse will operate from the date of advance payment of compensation 21.261 TL noting with interest from the defendant required the collection.

4 of the TCC numbered 6102 by the Court. and 5.accordingly, it was decided to dismiss the case due to the absence of litigation conditions due to lack of duty on the grounds that commercial lawsuits are counted in the articles, and that the dispute in question is not a commercial case; the judgment was appealed by the plaintiff’s attorney.

 

The case is the case of cancellation of the objection regarding the request for the prior collection of the compensation paid by the traffic insurer to those who were harmed.

 

4 of the Turkish Commercial Code. article 5 of the same law, in which the legal “cases” arising from this law are considered commercial cases. 2 of the article. in paragraph 4 of this law, if there is a commercial court anywhere, it is within the jurisdiction of the court of first instance. according to the provisions of the article, it is regulated that the “cases” considered commercial will be tried in the commercial court.

 

3 of the Turkish Commercial Code. in its article, “All transactions and acts related to a commercial enterprise with the issues regulated in this Law are commercial affairs.” has been arranged.

 

“Compulsory liability insurances” are regulated in Articles 1483 and continuation of the Turkish Commercial Code.

 

The verb within the scope of the Turkish Commercial Code, a legal action or staying in for the adoption of the purpose of the law given the above definitions, issues that are regulated in this law, a business in a related process, or must be a verb.

 

In the case subject to the lawsuit, the claim is related to the request for the first collection of compensation paid by the plaintiff’s traffic insurer to those who were harmed due to a traffic accident, the case, the Turkish Commercial Code 1483 et seq. It is understood that it is one of the issues mentioned in the articles. In this case, considering that the dispute falls under the duty of the Commercial Court of First Instance, entering into the merits of the case, collecting the evidence of the parties, evaluating their claims and defenses, and deciding on the outcome of the decision should be made, it was not considered correct to decide to dismiss the case due to incompetence as written.

 

result

 

For the reasons described above, it was unanimously decided on 05.11.2013 to OVERTURN the judgment with the acceptance of the plaintiff’s attorney’s appeals and to return the advance fee to the appellant plaintiff upon request.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

İSTANBUK İCRA DAİRELERİNDEKİ KAPALI DOSYALARIN ÇIKARILMA TALEBİ ARTIK BARONET ÜZERİNDEN YAPILABİLECEK Cancellation of the Officer’s Operation by Way of Complaint – Supreme Court Decision

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us