Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
05/11/2022

The Main Thing in the Arrangement of Custody Is the Superior Benefit of the Child – The Decision of the Supreme Court

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

T.C
SUPREME
2. law office
THE MAIN NO.2016/17354
DECISION NO.2018/5391
THE DATE OF THE DECISION.24.04.2018
COURT : Family Court
TYPE OF CASE : Divorce

>>THE MAIN THING IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF CUSTODY IS THE SUPERIOR BENEFIT OF THE CHILD.

At the end of the trial between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, the date and number of which are shown above, was appealed by the defendant male, the documents were read and Decisively discussed and considered:

1-The articles in the file, the evidence on which the decision is based and the reasons in accordance with the law, and in particular 166/1 of the TMK of the case. although accepted in accordance with Article 166/3 of the decision. according to the understanding that the writing of the article is a material error, the defendant
the man’s objections to the appeal, which fall outside the scope of the following paragraph, are unwarranted.

2-By the court, the custody of the common children born in 2004 … and born in 2008 … has been left to the plaintiff mother. The main thing in the arrangement of custody is the superior benefit of the children. No. 4787 On the Establishment, Duties and Judicial Procedures of Family Courts
5 Of the Law. in accordance with the article, experts consisting of psychologists, pedagogues and social workers within the Family Court are asked for an examination and report by interviewing both parents and children, and; parties, shelter, income, according to their social and psychological state of children for the healthy development of situation are to investigate whether an obstacle to assume custody by the court, the rest of the children of age, cognitive, and other evidence by taking into consideration exchanged opinions with them, which is the parent of the children’s best interest to stay determined and a decision should be made about custody would be in when writing the missing terms in the terms and procedures for the establishment of review and investigation of custody and has required it is against the law to break it.

CONCLUSION: The appealed judgment is above 2. according to the reason shown in the subparagraph, there is no place to examine appeals against participation alimony for the reason shown in the paragraph, and the other parts of the appeal that are outside the scope of disruption are 1 above. it was unanimously decided to APPROVE it for the reason indicated in the paragraph, to return the appeal advance fee to the depositor upon request, with the way to correct the decision being open within 15 days from the notification of this decision. 24.04.2018

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Loss of the Bond in the Bank, Cancellation of the Bond May Be Requested Due to Loss Supreme Court Decision Special Authorization Rule for Alimony Cases – Supreme Court Decision

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

Aşıkoğlu Law ™ International Law Office