Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
17/09/2022

A Lawsuit Petition Demanding the Return of the Missing Fugitive

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

… TO THE JUDGE OF THE CONSUMER COURT

PLAINTIFF : TC No:

address :

attorney :

address :

DEFENDANT :

address :

SUBJECT : It includes our request for the refund of the unjustly and unlawfully taken prices under the name of the lost bootleg fee and consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-Our client is billed by the defendant company every month according to the amount of electricity consumption he uses at the address where his residence is located. Our client has determined that the lost and illegal cost has been received under the name of “K/K cost”, which is not the service fee in the invoices that he regularly pays every month.

2-this bill in return for a service fee, obviously, malicious, illegal use of other users with gross negligence of the defendant company and supplier electricity distribution infrastructure and flaws caused by the lack of a price in exchange for the cost of missing and runaway consumption has been reflected in our client. Moreover, the loss and Decease rates also differ proportionally between regions. For this reason, a discrepancy can be seen even in the rates reflected on electricity bills, and the crime committed by someone else is reflected on the honest consumer on the other hand, and a defect is imposed on the person of our client for this reason. The defendant company, which is the electricity supplier, stated that this price was reflected in the invoices with the decision of the “EMRA”. We are also talking about this issue on our side ….. Also to the Arbitral Tribunal ….the application has been applied with the application number and has been accepted by the arbitral tribunal ….a decision has been made to refund this price.

3-In fact, 4 of the Law No. 4628. And 11. 10 of the Electricity Market Tariffs Regulation, by Article.in accordance with the relevant legal provisions, the decision taken by the EMRA regarding the reflection of loss / leakage costs on subscriber invoices constitutes a violation of the existing legal provisions. Moreover, the decision taken cannot be implemented in any way by going in front of the regulations and laws in force. In this context, the Law on Consumer Protection is a special law and precedes it in its current general provisions.

5-In accordance with the current legal provisions; According to the Law on Consumer Protection, it is necessary to take the necessary measures in the form that the consumer should be protected by recognizing that he is the weak party.

6-Within the framework of the issues explained above, the sum of the unjustly and unlawfully received prices …… .-The obligation to apply to your court for the return of TL has arisen.

LEGAL REASONS : 6502 P. K. m. 73, 4628 Pp. K. m. 4, 11 , Electricity Market Tariffs Regulation m. 10

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

1-) Invoices

2-) The extradition decision given as a result of the application to the arbitral tribunal

3-) Expert Examination

CONCLUSION AND CLAIM: The sum of the unjustly and unlawfully received prices for the reasons we have explained above, which is ………………… .- We respectfully request on behalf of our client to decide on the return of TL and to transfer the trial expenses and the power of attorney fee to the other party. …/…/…

ADDITIONAL :

1-)

Plaintiff Attorney

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Request to Pay the Contribution Share Receivable BEKİR BOZDAĞ’DAN HAKİM VE SAVCILARA AVUKATLARA KAPINIZI KAPATMAYIN ÇAĞRISI

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us