Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/05/2022

A Petition for an Appeal Against the Report of the Forensic Medical Institution

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

WHAT IS A FORENSIC REPORT?
These are reports that guide the judicial authorities in all kinds of incidents. The forensic report must first be prepared by the physician who conducts the examination and treatment. The forensic medical service is originally an expert service.

Forensic medicine is a branch of medicine that provides the legal system with the necessary evidence and information in the event of legal disputes or unexplained criminal acts in which medical data are contained. He helps the courts by preparing reports on the evidence. Especially in cases involving vital crimes such as injury, murder, suicide, sexual assault, assault, forensic medicine is resorted to more often. Forensic medicine physicians or forensic medicine departments of university hospitals act as experts in this context.

The perpetrator, victim, evidence of any crime or judicial dispute, or any individual affected by it (such as being a witness), may be the subject of a forensic medical report. Many biological materials as evidence (hair, blood, saliva, sexual fluids, body parts, bodies, or individuals belonging to, fingerprints, footprints, special items, such as tools to examine numerous item.

A PETITION FOR AN APPEAL AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE FORENSIC MEDICAL INSTITUTION
FILE NO : …/… E.

THE POLYTHEIST (T.(C) :

address :

attorney :

address :

suspect :

ADDRESS :

attorney :

address :

SUBJECT: …/…/… our objections to the report of the Forensic Medicine Institution dated

it contains.

INSTRUCTIONS

1-) In the first expert report received on the date of registration of your court on the above-mentioned basis …/…/… in the file of the first expert, “a bruise formed with a blunt object on the upper right shoulder, right hand 2. it has been stated that there is a dislocation in the finger and it cannot be removed by simple medical intervention”. In another report received on this … /…/… it was decided that “the dislocation that occurred at the time of the injury was corrected at the last general examination, it can be corrected by simple medical intervention” and due to the contradiction between the two reports, we appealed to your court … /… /… Dec the date of the Forensic Medical Institution ….. Your court has decided on the receipt of a report from the Specialized Department.

2-) On top of this, the Forensic Medicine Institution ….. A report has been prepared by the Specialized Agency, and this report is not clear and reasoned enough to be the basis for the decision to be made by your court. The issues contained in the two expert reports that have been given earlier and contain contradictions have not been clarified, and it is impossible that this report will be based on the provision.

3-) For the reasons that we tried to explain above, the Forensic Medicine Institution in question ….. We are objecting to the report of the Department of Expertise report.

LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73.

CONCLUSION AND PROMPT : For the reasons that we tried to explain above, …/…/… dated Forensic Medical Institution ….. Upon acceptance of our objections by the Specialized Department, we request by proxy that it be decided to conduct an expert review again and including the issues mentioned in our objections. …/…/…

 

Deputy of the Client

 

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Defense of the Acquitted Defendant And the Request for a Power of Attorney Fee A Petition Requesting the Abolition of a Judicial Control Decision

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us