Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
05/11/2022

Abuse of Trust Due to Service, Qualified Fraud, Forgery of a Private Document Supreme Court Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Summary:

The plaintiff owned by …………….Industry and Trade Ltd. Since there is no conclusive and sufficient evidence for the conviction that the defendant, who works as an accountant at Şti, committed the crime of abuse of trust due to service by disappearing by taking the TL 6,500 given to him by the client due to paying the company’s debts, there was no failure in the acceptance for acquittal.

 

T.C.
Supreme
15. Criminal Department

Main Number: 2013/19113
Decision No: 2015/32092
K. Historical:

The provision on the acquittal of the accused on the charge of abuse of trust due to the service, the public prosecutor of that Place, the provisions on the conviction of the accused on the charge of qualified fraud and forgery of a private document, were appealed by the defendant’s defense, the file was examined and considered as necessary:
Owned by the client ……………………… Industry and Trade Ltd. Since there is no conclusive and sufficient evidence to convict the defendant, who works as an accountant at Şti, that he committed the crime of abuse of trust due to service by disappearing by taking the TL 6,500 given to him by the client due to paying the company’s debts, there was no failure in the acceptance for acquittal.
In the qualified fraud crime, considering that the unfair benefit obtained is 5.500,00 TL and calculating twice the benefit, there is no appeal against the incomplete penalty determination by imposing a judicial fine of 275 days instead of 550 days, since there is no reason to overturn it.
TCK No. 5237.nin 53.in relation to the paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of the Article, the Constitutional Court issued a decree dated 08.10.2015 and dated E.2014/140, K.since the partial cancellation decision numbered 2015/85 was published in the Official Gazette dated 24.11.2015 and entered into force, it was deemed possible to observe it at the execution stage if conditions arise.
Trial conducted at the end of the service because of the crime of breach of trust was committed by the defendant by showing the reasons that’s not hard since it was made to be recognized and appreciated by the court, the defendant’s conviction for the crime of place that appeal to the decision of the public prosecutor thrown by counsel for the defendant appeals, fraud and falsifying documents regarding whether the elements of the crime of qualified private legal appeals with the rejection of the appeal, the request in accordance with the provisions APPROVED on 10.12.2015 it’s unanimous.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Case of the Stolen Cheque – Determination of the Ownership of the Right Supreme Court Decision Supreme Court Decision on Forgery in the Bill

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us