T.C. SUPREME 20. Legal Department Main No: 2016/5739 Decision No :2016/10025 Decision Date: 03.11.2016 Supreme Court Decision COURT: Magistrate’s Court In the Decease between the parties…. Magistrate and … 8. Separate non-jurisdiction by the Magistrates’ Courts all documents in the file sent to determine the place of jurisdiction due to the decision being made examined, […]
T.C. SUPREME 22. Legal Department Main No: 2015/18830 Decision No :2017/24921 Decision Date: 15.11.2017 EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES CASE – IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEVANT ARTICLE OF THE LAW PAYMENT OF SEVERANCE PAY TO THE EMPLOYEE UPON TERMINATION IF NECESSARY, THE EMPLOYER MUST COMPLY WITH THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT OR THERE ARE NO OBLIGATIONS TO PAY NOTIFICATION COMPENSATION […]
T.C. SUPREME 13. Legal Department Main No: 2012/21184 Decision No: 2012/20509 Decision Date: 28.09.2012 THE CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – WHEN THE CONCRETE EVENT IS EVALUATED Deconfliction BETWEEN THE PARTIES DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT WHICH IS DUE TO THE SERVICE – DEFINED IN THE LAW IN THIS WAY, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CONSUMER […]
T.C. SUPREME 12. law office Main Number : 2016/26097 Decision No :2018/333 Decision Date: 18.01.2018 SUPREME COURT DECISION COURT: Executive Law Court The creditor of the appellate examination within the period of the court decision with the date and number written above upon request, the file related to this work was sent to the apartment […]
T.C SUPREME 2. law office THE MAIN NO.2016/17354 DECISION NO.2018/5391 THE DATE OF THE DECISION.24.04.2018 COURT : Family Court TYPE OF CASE : Divorce >>THE MAIN THING IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF CUSTODY IS THE SUPERIOR BENEFIT OF THE CHILD. At the end of the trial between the parties, the verdict given by the local court, […]
T.C SUPREME 11. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/9880 DECISION NO: 2018/2363 DECISION DATE: 03.04.2018 >> LOSS OF THE BOND IN THE BANK – THERE IS A LEGAL INTEREST OF THE BANK IN REQUESTING THE CANCELLATION OF THE BOND DUE TO THE LOSS SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for cancellation of the bond […]
T.C. SUPREME 21. law office EESAS NO.: 2017/6302 DECISION NO: 2018/747 DECISION DATE: 5.2.2018 >>PROMPT REMOVAL OF THE SEIZURE PLACED ON THE PENSION-IRREGULAR NOTIFICATION 7201/m.12 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request to remove the lien placed on the pension. Although the court decided to dismiss the case on the grounds that the plaintiff […]
Summary: An expert examination was conducted by the court, the expert witness is the defendant tenant Y. Erzurum branch of Ziraat Bank from the account that was made Akbank account to uncomment 13.200 TL deposit belongs to the plaintiff discovered, dated 20.01.2015 plaintiff attorney in the court of rent arrears of these payments have been […]
T.C. SUPREME 7. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2014/15057 DECISION NO:2014/19544 DECISION DATE: 27.10.2014 > THE TESTIMONY OF THE PERSONS WHO HAVE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE EMPLOYER IS VALID FOR EACH OTHER. LAWSUIT: The decision made as a result of the lawsuit between the parties is examined by the Court of Cassation, the plaintiff and […]
T.C. SUPREME 5. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT Main Number: 2013/13743 Decision No: 2015/16274 K. Date:16.11.2015 The verdict given by the local court was appealed, the file was examined and the necessity was considered: During the prosecution of the defendant, who is a lawyer registered in the Ankara Bar Association, against the debtors in the capacity of creditor’s […]
