Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
10/12/2022

The Court Authorized to Issue an Inheritance Certificate for Foreign Deceased – The Decision of the Court of Cassation

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

T.C. SUPREME
20. Legal Department Main No: 2016/5739
Decision No :2016/10025
Decision Date: 03.11.2016
Supreme Court Decision
COURT: Magistrate’s Court
In the Decease between the parties…. Magistrate and … 8. Separate non-jurisdiction by the Magistrates’ Courts
all documents in the file sent to determine the place of jurisdiction due to the decision being made
examined, considered as necessary:
decision
The case is related to the request for the issuance of a certificate of inheritance.
… By the Magistrate’s Court, the muris and the heirs are foreign nationals (Greek citizens),
murisin …. 6. The Decision of the Civil Court of Peace numbered 2012/347 Basis- 2012/560 and the Sale
With the 2013/98 sales file of the civil service, the amount that hit the murisin share can be obtained from the sale
in order to work, this case was opened, the real estate subject to the dissolution of the partnership case….located in l, this is
in this case, MÖHUK’s 20. the Courts of Istanbul are authorized to issue probate certificates in accordance with the article
a decision of non-authorization has been made on the grounds that it is.
… 8. The Magistrate’s Court, on the other hand, has strict jurisdiction in cases of issuing a certificate of inheritance.
there is no objection to the authority of the parties, the court cannot make a decision of non-authority ex officio
he made a decision of lack of authority on the grounds.
From the scope of the file, the dispute, the request for the issuance of a certificate of inheritance belonging to the muris of the plaintiffs
it is understood that you are related.
Request for inheritance, provisional 3/2 of HMK No. 6100. article 382 of the HMK. uncontested in its substance
counted from judicial affairs 384. unless there is a contrary provision in the law, the non-contentious judgment
the court of residence of the person or one of the interested parties who has made a request for their work is authorized,
HMK’s 11/3. in the article on the cancellation of the inheritance certificate and the issuance of a new inheritance certificate
in the cases, it is stated that the court of the place where each of the heirs sits is also competent. This is hale
according to him, since there is no definite rule of authority in the cases of issuing a certificate of inheritance, the first case in which the case was opened
the one with the court…. It must be seen and concluded in the Magistrate’s Court.
CONCLUSION: For the reasons stated above; 21 and 22 of HMK No. 6100. according to the articles …. Peace
The DETERMINATION OF the Civil Court AS THE PLACE OF JURISDICTION was unanimously approved on 03/11/2016
it was decided.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

ADALET BAKANLIĞI ADLİ TIP KURUMU 40 SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALACAK Voluntary Petition for the Transfer of Ownership of the Land to the Material Owner

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us