Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
02/07/2022

Can Alimony And Compensation Be Ruled In Favor Of a Woman Who Is More Severely Defective In the Event of a Divorce

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

174 and 175 of the Turkish Civil Code, when the parties file for divorce from each other. They can apply for material and moral compensation and alimony in accordance with their articles. However, both for the claim for material and non-pecuniary damages and for the acceptance of the alimony claim, the law clearly stipulates that the requesting party must be less defective or flawless than the other party. According to the regulations on compensation and alimony that can be requested in a divorce case, articles 174 and 175 of the Turkish Commercial Code. It is included in the articles.

 

Article 174 of the TCC;

“A perfect or less defective party whose current or expected interests have been damaged by a divorce may request appropriate financial compensation from the defective party. The party whose right of personality has been attacked due to the events that caused the divorce may request that an appropriate amount of money be paid as moral compensation from the other party who is defective.”

 

and article 175 of the TCC;

“The party who will fall into poverty due to a divorce can ask for alimony indefinitely at the rate of his financial strength from the other side for his livelihood, provided that the defect is not more severe. The fault of the alimony obligation is not sought.”

As can be seen from the regulations made in the form, the parties can apply for material and moral compensation and alimony for poverty in divorce cases. However, the law clearly sought the condition that the fault of the requesting party should not be more severe for the acceptance of these requests. In the light of these regulations made in the law, it has been accepted in the case law of the Supreme Court that for the acceptance of material and moral compensation and child support claims, the claimant must be flawless or less imperfect.

 

Court of Cassation 2. Department of Law: 2016/11706 and K: 2016/12145 dated 23.06.2016 ;

“… 2- Above 1. as explained in the paragraph, the defendant woman is completely defective in the events that caused the divorce. 174/1 of the Turkish Civil Code. and 2. the following conditions have been established for the benefit of men. Accordingly, while appropriate amounts of material and non-pecuniary damages should be awarded for the benefit of the plaintiff male, the rejection of the request was not found to be correct.

 

3- The party who will fall into poverty due to a divorce may request alimony indefinitely at the rate of his financial strength from the other side for his livelihood, provided that the defect is not more severe. (TMK m. 175) The alimony of poverty for the benefit of the fully defective woman cannot be appreciated. In that case, while the woman’s request for alimony for poverty should be rejected, her acceptance in writing was not found to be correct.” Form in the arrangement in accordance with the judgment of divorce than men as a result of the marriage the Union of the woman in the end, if this is deemed to be seriously flawed, material and moral compensation will not get alimony.

In other words, in divorce cases, there is no provision for material and moral compensation and child support in all circumstances in favor of a woman. In the process of litigation, both the Supreme Court decisions and the TMK 174 and 175 that material and moral compensation and child support will not be ruled in favor of the woman if the man proves that the woman is more severely defective or fully defective in the divorce. It is determined in the articles.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Is Foreclosure of the House As a Result of Excessive Borrowing of the Spouse a Reason for Divorce Does the Sale of an Inheritance to a Person Who Lives Without Marriage Create a Muris Collision

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us