Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
27/08/2022

Can the Supreme Court Appeal the Approval Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

If the decisions made by the Court of Cassation, which is the previous appellate authority of the Constitutional Court within the Turkish Legal System, do not constitute a violation of the qualifications that will constitute the conditions for application to the Constitutional Court, these decisions made by the Court of Cassation have the effect of a final decision. However, this way of appeal against the decisions of the Criminal Chambers of the Supreme Court is open. In case of acceptance of this appeal to the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation, the relevant criminal file is returned to the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation. If the Criminal Chambers of the Court of Cassation reject the appeal, the file will be forwarded to the General Assembly of the Criminal Court of the Court of Cassation, which is the supreme council.

308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As a result of the authority granted to the Chief Prosecutor of the Republic of the Court of Cassation in Article II, the Chief Prosecutor of the Republic of the Court of Cassation will be able to object to these decisions either ex officio or on request from the date of delivery of the decision to him. As a result of the objection, the Criminal Division of the Court of Cassation will examine the objection as soon as possible, see the objection in place, and go on the way to correct the decision. Otherwise, the objection will be rejected.

How is an Appeal against the Supreme Court Approval Decision Made?

After the Court of Cassation Criminal Chamber approves the decision, the sentence is finalized and the execution of the sentence begins to be applied. In this context, an arrest warrant is issued for a person who has been subjected to criminal sanctions for prison sentences exceeding 3 years without informing the party, and law enforcement agencies take action. In this process, the defendant’s attorney requests the appeal of the approval decision from the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Supreme Court in order to stop the execution of the sentence. In order for this petition to be considered by the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, it is necessary to reconsider the case file, draw attention to aspects that were written or forgotten during the appeal process in the past, or that the Supreme Court did not focus much on in the previous appeal petition.

Duration of Appeal against the Decisions of the Supreme Court

This appeal to be made by the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation appears as the use of the Criminal Chamber 30 days after the date on the verdict made to the chief public prosecutor. However, there is no time limit for appeals to be made in favor of the accused.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

I was Scammed, How Can I File a Criminal Complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office The Fact That the Amount of Compensation And Alimony Appreciated In The Divorce Case Is Unfair Is the Reason For The Deterioration

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us