Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/05/2022

Differences Between Postponing the Sentence And Deferment of the Announcement of the Verdict

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Deferment of the announcement of the verdictmeans that the disclosure of the provision by the court is postponed and not disclosed at the end of the audit process. Postponing the sentence, on the other hand, means that the court gives a verdict of conviction and its execution is carried out through an audit process and is considered finished with the completion of the period. Postponement of punishment and postponement of the execution of a prison sentence are confused as concepts in practice.

If the defendant passes the audit process without any problems with the decision of the deferment of the announcement of the verdict, the provision that has been left undisclosed will not be disclosed. There will be no reflection of the deferment of the announcement of the verdict decision on the defendant’s criminal record. Because the decisions of the deferment of the announcement of the verdictare recorded in a separate register, except for the judicial register. However, in cases where a decision is made to postpone the sentence, the convict will have executed his deferred sentence outside the execution institution at the end of the prescribed inspection period, and the decision to postpone this sentence will be reflected in the judicial record.

The cases to be decided by the deferment of the announcement of the verdict are imprisonment for a term of 2 years or less or judicial fines, but the postponement of the sentence will only be for a prison sentence of 2 years or less.

For the decision of a firm conviction about the defendant for a crime previously deferment of the announcement of the verdict must not have been deliberate, but the law, the penalty for a crime the defendant’s deliberate delay of an institution that should not be sentenced to more than 3 months previously foreseen.

The decision of the deferment of the announcement of the verdict cannot be made without the request and approval of the defendant, but the consent of the convict does not need to be obtained in order to be able to decide on a postponement.

It is not possible to make a deferment of the announcement of the verdict decision about the person who has been given a deferment of the announcement of the verdict decision if the dates of the crime are after the deferment of the announcement of the verdict decision has been finalized. In cases where a decision on postponement may be made, it does not matter whether a postponement has already been decided about it or not.

IS IT IN FAVOR OF POSTPONING THE SENTENCE OR IN FAVOR OF THE DEFERMENT of the ANNOUNCEMENT of the VERDİCT ?
As it can be seen, in terms of the registration status and disclosure of the verdict, deferment of the announcement of the verdict is more in favor of the defendant compared to the institution for the postponement of the sentence. For this reason, if the conditions are favorable for adjournment decisions, deferment of the announcement of the verdict can be given, while the decision to postpone the sentence should be appealed due to the decision being made and the legal path against the decision should be followed.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Effective Remorse in the Criminal Code Should Unfair Incitement Discount Be Applied If The Victim Is Insulted And There Is Mutual Blasphemy In the Crime of Intentional Homicide

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us