Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
27/08/2022

Enforcement And Bankruptcy Offense 1

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Execution and Bankruptcy Offense – Causing Incapacity by His Own Act Or Knowingly Aggravating the Badness of His Situation

Knowing the cause or aggravate the degradation of your own weakness with the actual condition of the debtor to be made in order for crime to occur in the text of the acts described crimes law enforcement; bold pieces to be made to an inappropriate or excessive expense or carelessness by acting with gross negligence or in games or in business basiretsizce fortune by speculation of his own weakness when he knows the actual cause of the situation to give or hindering this evil must find the evil with moves like that.

Again, in order for the crime of intentionally aggravating the condition of the debtor to occur within the scope of enforcement offenses, the debtor must have committed these acts ‘after the request for follow-up by foreclosure or within two years before the request for follow-up by foreclosure or the request for concordat respite’.

The person who causes the weakness with his own act or aggravates the badness of his condition intentionally is not wanted in order for execution crimes to occur, the accused may also cause this crime to occur with his negligent behavior. As the defendant is not seeking to put his creditor into harm, it is necessary that the creditor has seen the damage in November in order to exercise his right to complain.

For the crime of causing incapacity by his own act or knowingly aggravating the badness of his condition, the creditor is required to have a incapacity certificate in his hand or to prove that he cannot receive what he will receive. Execution crimes will not occur in cases where the incapacity certificate cannot be obtained, the creditor cannot prove that he cannot receive his receivable, and a temporary incapacity certificate is obtained.

The follow-up of the crime of intentionally aggravating the condition of the person who caused the disability with his own act or condition is made upon complaint. The court in charge of enforcement offenses is the Enforcement Criminal Court, and the authorized court is the court of the debtor’s residence or the enforcement court to which the enforcement directorate is attached to the place where enforcement proceedings are conducted.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Fact That the Amount of Compensation And Alimony Appreciated In The Divorce Case Is Unfair Is the Reason For The Deterioration Enforcement And Bankruptcy Offense 2

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us