Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
11/06/2022

How Do I File a Defamation Lawsuit

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Disclosure of the Case of Defamation and the element of “Insult” is provided in Article 125-131 of the Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237.it is Deciphered among its substances.

Firstly, if necessary to make the determination of whether the insult occurred, according to the law, the presence of an insult in the following cases is possible to talk about a person’s dignity, honour and dignity will be able to offend and harm that can also attributed to the presence of a concrete action or phenomenon of nature in the same way or by calling a person’s dignity, honour and reputation are the items that give rise to the presence of an insult attacking.

To give a few examples of the insulting situation;

It is obvious to a person that “dishonorable”, “dishonorable”, “retarded”, “stupid”, “animal”, “manuscript”, etc. saying such words constitutes a crime of defamation.

It is an insult to say “lame man of Allah” to someone who walks without a trace, and to say “blind man” to someone who does not see the eye.

When a person is told, “you stole my things,” if this fact is proven, no offense to defamation will occur. But, to a person who has a criminal record for a previous theft offense, saying “you are a thief” gives rise to the offense of defamation.

The offense of defamation should not only be committed by word, but also the verb in the nature of the offense of defamation can be committed by writing, shape, image, hand sign or facial expressions. For example, putting human feces on a person’s work desk is a crime of defamation.

The right to petition and criticism, the right of the press to publish news, the words and actions said and done within the scope of the immunity of claim and defense do not constitute a crime of defamation.

Punishment for the Offense of Defamation

The punishment for insulting a person is established by law. This punishment is 125/1 of the Turkish Criminal Code.according to its article, it is given in the form of imprisonment from 3 months to 2 years or a fine appropriate for this period.

Defamation Crimes Committed Against Public Officials: As an exception, in cases where an insult is committed against an officer and within the framework of this officer’s duty, this punishment starts with a minimum of 1 year.

Along with other reasons that increase the penalty in defamation cases (qualified cases), other exceptions applied in defamation cases can be listed as follows:

The penalty for insulting crimes committed for explaining, changing, spreading religious, political, social, philosophical beliefs, thoughts and convictions, acting in accordance with the orders and prohibitions of the religion to which he belongs, and for insulting crimes committed through values considered sacred according to the religion to which the person belongs, starts from 1 year.

In cases where it is established that the insult was committed openly publicly, the penalty is increased by 1/6.

If the offense of defamation that is the subject of the lawsuit was committed in response to a wrongful act, it may be decided to reduce the punishment to 1/3. In addition, Article 129 of the Turkish Criminal Code.in the cases written in the article, it is stipulated that the complainant defendant shall not take any offense. For example, if a person commits an offense of insult in response to a crime of intentional wounding, no punishment is provided for this offense of insult.

In the offense of insulting the victim’s face, it is sufficient that the victim learns about the insulting words or behavior at that moment. Phone, mail, letter, sms, etc. to the victim. an insult made using such communication methods is also considered to be made directly against the victim’s face. It is enough for the victim to find out about the insult made to him by these means of communication for the offense of defamation to occur.

In the absence of the victim, the offense of defamation may occur when at least 3 people find out the words and behavior of the abuser. In the absence of a victim in the insulting environment, that is, in absentia, the law requires that the act that constitutes an insult be committed in conflict with 3 people. The person who insulted the three people in question is not included himself. It is not necessary that three people are in the same place, the main thing is that three people find out about the insult. For example, the offense of defamation takes place when other neighbors sitting in their own homes hear the words of a person shouting at the victim in absentia, “that man is a bastard, a scoundrel,” in a garden cavity.

Punishment in Case of Mutual Insult: In the same way, if the offense of insult was committed by both parties mutually, it was stipulated that no offense was given in this case or the offense given would be reduced by 1/3.

Application for a Defamation Case

In order for defamation cases to be processed, it is necessary to file a complaint with the Public Prosecutor’s Office within 6 months after the defamation takes place by writing a petition or testifying in law enforcement.However, qualified cases of defamation are not subject to complaint. Therefore, there is no complaint period limitation. In case of committing qualified cases of the crime, the public prosecutor’s office officially opens an investigation. The sample petition text is available on our website.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

It Would Not Be an Insult for the Person Who Has Been Wronged to Complain A Petition Requesting the Issuance of a Probate Order

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us