Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
13/08/2022

In a Divorce Case Due to Mental Illness, a Disease Other Than Mental Illness Does Not Constitute a Reason for Divorce

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

165 of the Turkish Civil Code. The article regulates the divorce proceedings due to mental illness. ‘ if one of the spouses is mentally ill and therefore the joint life becomes unbearable for the other spouse, this spouse can file for divorce, provided that it is determined by the official medical board report that this disease is not possible to pass.’’

If the mental illness that is the reason for the divorce is the kind of mental illness that will prevent marriage, it must have occurred after the marriage. Mental illness before marriage is one of the definite barriers to marriage. However, if the marriage has taken place, this marriage is absolutely null and void.

In order for one of the spouses to file for divorce on the basis of mental illness, the other spouse must be mentally ill. Civil law any disease, not just how severe mental illness olupher although counted as a reason for divorce with no hope of recovery, epilepsy, leprosy, syphilis, plague, for divorce on the basis of diseases such as AIDS can be opened.

In order for a divorce case to be filed on the basis of mental illness, there should be no possibility of recovery of mental illness. In the event that there is a possibility of recovery of the disease, the judge will not decide on a divorce, but will dismiss the case.

One of the important conditions in a divorce case due to mental illness is to prove that the joint life has become unbearable. Although the mental illness is proven by the official medical board report, the judge does not immediately decide on a divorce. The issue that needs to be investigated is whether the common life has become unbearable.

 

SUPREME COURT 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT 2004/4941 E. 2004/7899 K. 15.06.2004 t.

“… It is understood that the defendant suffers from ‘ epilepsy of the temporal type (sara)’. The presence of this disease in one of the spouses is not in itself a reason for divorce. There is no evidence that the defendant avoided the treatment of his illness, as well as in the report received, it was determined that he was spiritually qualified to conduct the marriage. Apart from the fact that the defendant has Sara’s disease, the existence of another concrete event that will shake the marriage union from its foundation and leave no possibility for the continuation of joint life has not been revealed. In that case, it was not considered correct to decide to divorce in writing while the case should be dismissed. ‘’

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

What Are Your Rights in Case of Health Problems Due to Doctor’s Error Types of Contracts for the Renunciation of Inheritance

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us