Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
05/11/2022

In Order For Poverty And Subsidiary Alimony To Be Claimed, the Divorce Provision Must Be Finalized Supreme Court Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Summary:

HUMK’s 443/3. according to the article; Although the decision does not need to be finalized in terms of precautionary alimony, the divorce provision must be finalized in order for poverty and subsidiary alimony to be claimed.

 

T.C.
Supreme
12. law office

Main Number: 2011/3369
Decision No:2011/19386
K. Date:17.10.2011

Within the time limit of the court decision with the date and number written above, the appellate examination was requested by the debtor, the file related to this work was sent to the apartment from the scene, but it was read and discussed and considered as necessary :

By the creditor Gaziosmanpasa 2. 09.03.2010 2007/1262 of the family court date and is based on when you started enforcement proceedings based on decision 2010/252 numbered ilamli through divorce, ref under the provision in the individual receivables 300,00 TL per month with poverty, a subsidiary 250.00 GBP is desired, where the collection of alimony, the court on application to the enforcement debtor, receivables, while the divorce to be finalized, it cannot be put in execution, it also has the divorce to be finalized, while participation of poverty and it is seen that for reasons that may not be required alimony prompted to cancel.
In the decision on the basis of follow-up, it was understood that TL 150 of the monthly precautionary alimony in favor of the joint child and the plaintiff noble was ordered to continue until the decision was finalized, TL 300.00 poverty and TL 250.00 participation alimony following the finalization of the provision.

In this case, only a monthly alimony of TL 300.00 may be requested until the finalization of the divorce provision in accordance with the verdict.

HUMK’s 443/4. in accordance with the article, the provisions related to family and personal law cannot be subject to prosecution unless they are finalized. In addition, the provisions for compensation, power of attorney fees and trial expenses, which are additional to the divorce decision, are also subject to the same rule. However, if the divorce decision is finalized, it is not necessary for the requests for compensation, power of attorney fee and trial expenses to be finalized by taking into consideration their qualifications in order to be followed up (HGK. 28.2.2001 date 2001/12-206E. 2001/217 K. ).

HUMK’s 443/3. according to the article; Although the decision does not need to be finalized in terms of precautionary alimony, the divorce provision must be finalized in order for poverty and subsidiary alimony to be claimed.Affiliate items through divorce with poverty and other receivables under the provision following the terms of my divorce being finalized in terms of support is the basis kesinlesip ref, is final only after the date has been determined by the relevant court kesinlesme questions should make a decision based on the result that will occur when the facility is based on an incomplete review isabetsiz provision in writing.
CONCLUSION : With the acceptance of the debtor’s appeal objections, the court’s decision was based on the reasons written above in SEC 366 and HUMK 428. in accordance with its articles (DETERIORATION), it was unanimously decided on 17/10/2011.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Rent Receivable – Cancellation of the Objection, Evidentiary Value of E-Mail Printouts Supreme Court Decision Intentional Wounding, Depriving A Person of His Freedom , Simple Sexual Abuse of A Child in Such A Way As to Impair Physical Or Mental Health

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us