Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
20/08/2022

In the Crime of Theft, If the Defendant Takes Only As Much (70 TL) As He Needs, T.C.K. According to Article 145, Should the Penalty Be Reduced Due to the “Low Value of the Goods”

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

T.C. SUPREME

2.Criminal Department
Basis: 2015/17090
Verdict: 2018/222
Decision Date: 24.01.2018

CRIME OF THEFT – THE NEED TO OBSERVE THAT THE CONCEPT OF SCARCITY OF VALUE REFERS TO THE RECEIPT OF THINGS THAT ARE REALLY SCARCE ONLY AS MUCH AS NECESSARY AND IN VALUE, WHILE THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE MORE OF THEM

SUMMARY: the lack of value of the concept of crime with the aim of the legislators general information about the nature of the incident and was also observed by the defendant’s spent the muscles, while as a value and have the ability to receive more things that also really the only requirement, as least in the case of the removal of legal and sufficient justification can be applied to explaining observed that it must be.

(5237 Pp. K. m. 145) (765 Pp. K. m. 522)

The file was examined and considered as necessary;

1-… in the examination of appeals against the conviction sentence established for the crime of violating the workplace immunity;

According to the evidence collected at the hearing on the overturning, the reason, the opinion and discretion of the judge, the appeal objections are not in place, so the decision is rejected and the verdict is UPHELD as a request,

2- … in the examination of appeals against the conviction established on the crime of theft;

According to the scope of the file, other appeals were not considered on the spot. But;

145 of the TCK No. 5237. article 522/1 of the Law No. 765 on the concept of ”low value of goods”. in the article the criteria and slight very slight similarity, except that it gives a discount from the punishment of both substances in the absence of a “lack of value” Law No. 5237-specific, separate, and it is a new concept, the nature of the incident, the defendant’s personality and spent a showing of intent to evaluate and legal and sufficient reasons, by considering a concrete case that can be applied by; in the event that the child who was dragged into the crime stole the 70 TL coin belonging to the client, … on the insufficient grounds that the conditions for its implementation have been formed, but the conditions have not been formed, Article 145 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237. non-application of the article,

Since the defense’s appeals were considered on the spot in this respect, it was decided unanimously on the day of 24.01.2018 to OVERTURN the verdict for these reasons.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Is It Necessary to Accept the Case of Both Spouses When It is Understood That the Plaintiff – Counter-Defendant Spouse Is Also Right to File a Lawsuit The Decision of the Supreme Court to Pay the Money Entering the Execution Coffers to the Creditor Before the Execution Proceedings are Finalized

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us