Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/05/2022

Mandatory Documents in the Recognition Enforcement Case Supreme Court Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

COURT OF CASSATION 2. law office

Based on : 2010/15094

Decision : 2011/4618

Date : 15.03.2011

RECOGNITION OF A FOREIGN COURT DIVORCE DECISION (Mandatory Documents to be Attached to the Lawsuit Petition)
ENFORCEMENT OF A FOREIGN COURT DIVORCE DECISION (Mandatory Documents to be Attached)

2675 Tu.Ca.37

The petition containing the request for the enforcement of the decree of divorce of a Foreign Court must be accompanied by the original and approved translation of the Decree of the foreign court, duly approved by the authorities of that country, as well as the translation of the letter or document confirming the finalization of the decree and duly approved by the authorities of that country.

CASE AND DECISION

At the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties, the Deconstruction of the provision given by the local court and shown in the date number above for the benefit of the law was requested by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court upon the request of the Ministry of Justice, the documents were read and discussed as necessary and considered.

COURT OF CASSATION 2. DECISION OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT

In the case filed by the deputy plaintiff, it is understood that the decision to enforce the divorce decision No. 6F 366/04 S dated 8/9/2005 of the Magistrate Court of Germany-Alfeld (Lein) was requested, as a result of the trial by the court, the case was decided to be accepted, and the decision was finalized without appeal.

The Law No. 2675 on Private International Law and Procedural Law in force at the date of its provision is Article 37. According to this provision, although it is mandatory to attach the translation of the foreign court’s decision approved by the authorities of that country and approved by the authorities of that country with a duly approved article or document to the petition, it was also not found correct to be content with a COPY by not complying with these considerations.

Result

427/6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Supreme Court. based on the article of the law on the adoption of a request to overturn for the benefit of the described reason, it was unanimously decided that the provision would not affect the outcome ( DETERIORATION ) of the decision.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Mandatory Documents in the Recognition Enforcement Case Can a Worker Be Dismissed Without Compensation

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us