Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
23/07/2022

Non-Payment of Alimony Payable Complaint Period Supreme Court Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

19.CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT 2015/17807 E. , 2015/9225 K.
“text of jurisprudence”
Communiqué No: PUK – 2015/306126
He was accused of non-compliance with the alimony provisions.. K.. 347 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code of 2004 of the complaint against you. according to Article 11 of the Ankara Convention on the reduction of the right of complaint on the grounds that it has not been used within 3 months. Ankara 12 on the rejection of the appeal against the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 02/12/2014 and based on 2014/164, decision 2014/151 Ankara 12. The case file attached to the letter containing the request of the Ministry of Justice to overturn the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 08/12/2014 and numbered 2014/108 for the benefit of law numbered 28/08/2015 days and 56634 of October 29/09/2015 days and PUK of the Supreme Court of Public Prosecutor’s Office. 2015-306126 notice was given to the apartment with the reading.
In the above-mentioned notice;
Ankara 11. 347 of the Law on Enforcement and Bankruptcy, according to which the offense of non-paying the alimony debt was established on 26/11/2013 by the Executive Criminal Court after the notification of the executive order. in accordance with article 3 of the Law No. 347 of the Law No. 2004, although it was decided to reduce the right to complain on the grounds that the right to complain is 3 months from the date of learning the act and that the non-payment of the child support debt may be paid immediately. article 15 of the Ankara Law on the collection of alimony receivables, in which it is regulated that the right of complaint will be reduced by 3 months from the date of learning of the act and in any case by 1 year from the date of the act, Ankara law on the collection of alimony receivables. No. 2012/6528 Executive Executive Directorate of the file, the subject of the complaint 2014 March, April and may month child support for any action of debt by a creditor after the current date in the file when execution has been done, regarding whether he had paid the debt in the absence of any information as to scope and document the file accordingly, learning the history of the adoption as of the date 19/06/2014 the court made a complaint to the enforcement of the law, Article 347. 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271 on the grounds that the 3-month and 1-year periods provided for in accordance with the article have not yet expired as of the date of the complaint, and there has been no hit in deciding to reject the appeal in writing instead of accepting it. it was discussed and considered necessary to request that the decision referred to in accordance with the article be overturned in the interests of the law;
Since the contents of the notice based on the request of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Supreme Court of Cassation to overturn it for the benefit of the law are seen on the spot, Ankara 12. Article 309/4 of the CMK of the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 08/12/2014 and amended on 2014/108. it was unanimously decided on 24/12/2015 that it would be OVERTURNED in accordance with the article and that the subsequent actions would be carried out by the local court.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Supreme Court Decision That the Penalty Will Be Reduced If the Alimony Debt is Paid Supreme Court Decision on Vehicle Depreciation Case

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us