Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
10/09/2022

Petition Demanding Compensation Due to Confiscation of the Immovable

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

…… TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT;

PLAINTIFF : Tc No:

address :

attorney :

address :

DEFENDANT :

address :

SUBJECT: It includes our request for compensation due to the legal seizure of the immovable and consists of the submission of our petition.

CASE VALUE :

DATE OF NOTIFICATION : …/…/…

A O I K L A M A L A R I M I Z

1-) Our client, … Province, … District … kain, … Island, …. He is the owner of the entire parcel of real estate numbered … m2.

2-) The immovable in question, …/…/…. in the dated Zoning Plan, it is reserved for public service as a children’s parking area; however, it is immovable…. although it has been allocated to the public service as a children’s parking area since the year, no action has been taken on it in accordance with the purpose of allocation to this day. In addition, it is also fixed that no actual confiscation action has been carried out by the defendant administration on the immovable property.

3-) Our client repeatedly requests the expropriation of the immovable property or the transaction in accordance with the purpose of allocation …. Mayor ….. Although he applied to the Governor’s Office, his applications were unsuccessful; although the immovable property has been reserved as a children’s parking area for years in the zoning plan, the expropriation process has not been carried out by the defendant institution in accordance with its purpose.

3-) This situation has eliminated our client’s right to savings on the immovable property in question. …. although our client has the opportunity to build on the immovable property allocated to the children’s parking area in the zoning plan since the year and has not been expropriated for many years, it is clear from the explanation that he could not do this and was a victim.

4-) For these reasons, which we have explained, the defendant administration has been obliged to apply to your court for the collection of the non-expropriated confiscation of the immovable … m2 from the defendant institution for the expropriation of the non-expropriated confiscation of the immovable.

LEGAL REASONS : 2942 P. K. Late. m. 6, 2577 P. K. m. 2, 2247 P. K. m. 10, 12, 27

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

1-) Land registry records,

2-) …./…/… dated zoning plan,

3-) …/…/… …. Application to the Mayor’s Office,

CONCLUSION AND CLAIM : For the reasons we have explained above, … Ili, ….The district of … in the locality of kain, … Island, …. Parcel numbered … m2 of real estate in exchange for confiscation without expropriation … TL. the cost….. it will work from the date ….. we respectfully request bilvekale on behalf of our client to decide on the collection of the defendant’s administration, along with interest, and the transfer of trial expenses to the other party. …/…/…

Plaintiff Attorney

Lawyer.

ADDITIONAL:

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Petition for Cancellation of the Expropriation Decision and Compensation Request Request for Compensation Due to Terrorist Act

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us