Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/07/2022

Petition for an Appeal against an Administrative Fine (Traffic Ticket)

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

… TO THE SENTRY MAGISTRATE’S OFFICE

ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS

THE OBJECTOR :

ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS

DECIDE :

THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL IS THE MINUTES OF

DATE OF ARRANGEMENT :

THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL IS THE MINUTES OF

HISTORY OF THE THESIS :

WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF APPEAL

ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION : T.C. … The Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Izmir Misdemeanor Bureau’s Misdemeanor Book contains our objection to the administrative sanction decision No. 1 and consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

The administrative fine imposed on my client is contrary to the law and it is not possible to accept the fine. That is to say;

1-) … a special motorcycle registered on the registration plate; …/… /… dated October …, as a result of the traffic police stopping on the street, my client was presented with an appendix on the grounds that the crime of “Non-Compliance with Traffic Signs” was committed in accordance with Article 47 /1B of the Traffic Code of Highways 2918 …/… /… dated, total … TL. a paid traffic ticket report has been prepared and, in addition, a Serial crime report has been prepared about my client in accordance with Article 39 /1A of Law 2918.

2-) My client received a traffic fine …/…/… on the date T.C. The Ministry of Finance … the Tax Office … the Vehicles Tax Office … has paid with the receipt number. October payable receipt in question is attached to the sample.

3-) Then T. C. … The Prosecutor General’s Office … has imposed an administrative fine of TL on behalf of the client on the date of /…// For the “Crime of Driving with Insufficient License” with the /… Misdemeanor book Number and //… Decision number of the Misdemeanor Bureau. The decision in question has been communicated on …/…/… date.

4-) Article m of the Road Traffic Code No. 2918, which is indicated as the legal basis for an administrative fine. The article of 39/1A is as follows;

“Principles of driver’s licenses

Article 39 – The principles of driver’s licenses are as follows;

a) Authority to use vehicles;
A 1, F, G and H are the only vehicles in their classes with driver’s licenses,
A 1 with A 2 class driver’s license,
F with a class B driver’s license,
B and F with a class C driver’s license,
C, B, and F with a class D driver’s license,
(AMENDED SUBPARAGRAPH RGT: 27.10.1996 RG NO: 22800 LAW NO: 4199/17)

Vehicles used with B, C and F, Class driver’s licenses can also be driven with an E-class driver’s license.
5-) article 2918 of the Road Traffic Code. 36 of the same law as a result of violations that will be made on the basis of the provision of 39 / 1A. the fines that will be deducted by sending to the article are TL … as of the year … within the framework of the revaluation rate. For this reason, the TL issued on behalf of the client is higher than the legal amount of the administrative sanction penalty in question and lacks legal basis. Because … when the amounts of traffic fines deducted in the year are examined … it will be seen that TL does not respond to any legal sanctions.

6-) For this reason, it is necessary to decide on the cancellation of the written fine in the traffic record subject to the objection issued and notified in violation of the law, taking into account Article 39 / 1A of the law in question.

LEGAL REASONS : 2918 P. K. m. 36, 39, 47.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: For the reasons that we have tried to present and explain above; we respectfully request from your Supreme Court that the decision be made to cancel the administrative fine of YTL …-, which was issued in violation of the law with the acceptance of our appeal, and to burden the defendant with the costs of the trial. …/…/…

The Objector’s Deputy

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Appeal against the Decision to Withdraw the Disclosure of the Provision Petition for a Prison Transfer Request (Penitentiary Institution)

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us