Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
08/10/2022

Petition for Deletion of Judicial Record

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr

CRIMINAL REGISTRY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE

Whereby

TO THE GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF JUDICIAL REGISTRY STATISTICS

Criminal Record

Who Wants to Be Deleted (TC) :

Address :

Subject : It is a request to delete the criminal record.

Penalties : 1. …….. Of the Criminal Court …/…/… date and E. …/… K. …/… decision no. and …….. Of the Criminal Court …/…/… date and E. …/… K. …/… decision no.

Descriptions :

1. I was tried and convicted in the above-mentioned files. The periods required for the deletion of the convictions from the criminal record have expired. Since the records whose legal deletion periods have expired are seen in the criminal registry document, these records cause loss of rights in job applications and other matters.

2.According to the Law on the Execution of Sentences and the Criminal Registry Law, the necessary conditions for the deletion of the registry record have been fulfilled. For the reasons stated, there was a need to request that the criminal record be deleted as soon as possible.

Evidence: Convictions, criminal records and all kinds of legal evidence.

Legal Reason : The Criminal Registry Law and other relevant legislation.

Conclusion and Request: I request that the judicial record, which is clearly visible in the above-mentioned and attached judicial record document, be deleted as soon as possible and that we be informed of its result.

Who Wants the Criminal Record to Be Deleted

ADDITIONAL :

– Certificate of criminal record registration.

– Power of Attorney

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Petition to Appeal the Decision Not to Grant Permission for Investigation Is The Defendant Who Stole Thirty-Six TL Seventy-Five Kurus Worth Of Cheddar Cheese And Chocolate Punished

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us