Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/07/2022

Petition to Appeal the Arrest Decision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

…… …. TO THE CRIMINAL COURT

THE DECISION TO CAPTURE

OBJECTOR (SUSPECT) :

T.C. Identity No :

address :

THE DEFENDER :

address :

SUBJECT : It consists in the supply of an appeal against the decision to capture.

descriptions:

1-) our client …… since ……. He is serving as the headman of the village; .…/…./….. an arrest warrant has been issued against him for aiding and abetting a terrorist organization. However, the decision in question was taken in accordance with Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271.on the other hand, it constitutes a violation of procedure and the law.

2-) Article 98 of the law No. 5271. in the article “An arrest warrant may be issued by a magistrate at the request of the public prosecutor about a suspect who did not come on call or could not be called during the investigation phase. In addition, in case of an appeal against the decision to refuse the request for arrest, an arrest warrant may also be issued by the appeal authority. according to the regulation in the form of “; Before the decision to arrest is made, the suspect must be called by the court and an arrest decision must be made about the suspect who does not appear before the court on the call. It is against the procedure and the law to issue an arrest warrant against our client who has no knowledge of the crime for the reasons mentioned.

LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 94, 95, 96, 97, 98.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: We respectfully request that the arrest decision about the client be lifted for the reasons presented above and that the client’s statement be taken by instruction from the address we have provided on behalf of our client be decided by proxy on behalf of our client. …/…/…

SUSPECT DEFENSE

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Petition for Dismissal of the Complaint Objection of Authority – Decision of the Supreme Court

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us