Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
08/10/2022

Prompt Petition for Removal of Trusteeship

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

….. TO THE MAGISTRATE OF THE CIVIL COURT

PLAINTIFF : TC No:

address :

attorney :

address :

MATERIALLY RELATED :

SUBJECT : The removal of the trustee includes our request consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) …. The Magistrate’s Court …/…/… T. …/… E. …/… K. in the numbered file …. …. ‘s a common-law relationship from where he lived in the …/…/…. in the paternity case that will be filed in relation to this, in which he came into the little world in his history …. …. on the grounds that the interests of küçük and his child küçük will conflict, it was requested to appoint a trustee for küçük, and as a result of this case, our client … …. he has been appointed as a trustee.

2-) The paternity case mentioned in the … Court … /… /… T. …/… E. …/… K. it was opened on the date of …/…/… in the numbered file, this case was decided on the date of … /… /… and was finalized on the date of … /…/….

3-) 447 of the Turkish Civil Code No. 4721. Article;

“The representation of the trustee ends with the completion of the work that the trustee is assigned to do.

The management trusteeship ends with the disappearance of the reason requiring the appointment of the trustee or the dismissal of the trustee.Legal advice ends with the decision of the guardianship authority in accordance with the provisions on the abolition of guardianship.”he has his provisions.

Due to the fact that the paternity case has been opened and finalized within the framework of this provision, the work undertaken by our client as a trustee has ended.

4-) For the reasons explained …. The Magistrate’s Court …/…/… T. …/… E. …/… K. the obligation to request the removal of the trustee of our client, who was appointed as a trustee with the numbered decision, from your court has been concluded with this petition.

LEGAL REASONS : 6100 p. K. m. 1, 4, 5, 6; 4721 P. K. m. 403, 426, 428, 429, 430, 431, 477, 478.

LEGAL EVIDENCE : 1-) …. The Magistrate’s Court …/…/… T. …/… …/… K.the numbered decision

2-)… The Court of … /…/… T. …/… E. …/… K. the numbered decision

 

CONCLUSION AND CLAIM : For the reasons described …. The Magistrate’s Court …/…/… T. …/… E. …/… K. we respectfully request from your court that the trustee of our client, who was appointed as a trustee with the numbered decision, be removed. …/…/….

ADDITIONAL :

Plaintiff Attorney

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Request for the Appointment of a Trustee Prompt Petition for Change of Identity Information

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us