Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/05/2022

Proof of Divorce Due to Infidelity

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Ranging from the early ages to the present day, people there that evaluated on the axis, culture, social environment and people’s life style as a view of concreteness winning relationships, which has a dynamic structure in today’s world, especially unwelcome realization of the possibilities technology offers for the purpose of developing public behavior with the use and alienation of individuals from each other, a sense of loyalty in people’s lives the same importance as it was centuries ago now, maybe by not losing the essence and value judgments are moving away from.

The last time the termination of marriage and relationships, which is one of the common causes of deception, dened as an immoral action, most authorities, especially while considering the structure of Turkish society of people of their dignity and honor as a matter of honour with regard injurious behavior in the form of a form is to say, it is one of the causes of divorce.

Infidelity, which has many reasons such as decreased emotional commitment, loss of importance of loyalty and inability to meet each other’s expectations with some changes in people’s lives, is the subject of the Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 titled adultery 161.this is a special and absolute reason for divorce, which is regulated in the article. Accordingly, if one of the spouses commits adultery, the other spouse may file for divorce due to infidelity. Six months after the spouse who has the right to sue finds out the reason for the divorce, and in any case five years after the act of adultery, the right to sue is reduced, and the pardoning party does not have the right to sue.

As it turned out, the legislator clearly stated that the deceived spouse has the right to file for divorce. However, here, taking a clear position on divorce is not enough for a judge to rule on a divorce due to adultery, and the claim put forward in terms of the desired outcome must be proven before the court.

Most cheaters are individuals who are aware of the actions of many people, and the need to hide this, due to human nature, leads to a number of difficulties for the deceived spouse to prove it. Persons can submit any documents to the court as evidence, such as photos, videos, sms recordings that will prove the existence of this action, letters written to a lover, movements that occur in this direction on social networking sites, provided that they do not obtain it illegally. Again, the true and true statements of witnesses remain important in cases where deception is involved, but they have a full effect if they are supported by other evidence.

It should be noted that the periods stipulated by the law, which are six months from the date of learning of the act of adultery and in any case five years after the fact of the act, are important for the acceptance of the divorce case to be filed on the basis of this reason. Also forgive a cheating wife, oral without express or implied or behavior is revealed in the form of a difference as the judge of the reason of convincing evidence or witness statements in cases that decide to get divorced to recognize the importance of it is based on deception. All evidence is disposed of after the expiration of the period of deprivation of rights or with the forgiveness of the deceived spouse.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Infidelity After Filing for Divorce The Necessary Conditions for a Divorce Abroad to Be Valid in Turkey

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us