Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
27/08/2022

Reinstatement

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

The Code of Civil Procedure (6100 p.) The Second Distinction of the Sixth Part of the First Part, entitled General Provisions, regulates the institution of “Reinstatement”. Provisions on reinstatement, which bring significant changes to the provisions of the HUMK period, 95 and 101. it is Decoded between the items.

Reinstatement (reinstatement, hali sabika irca) is the recognition of the right to perform these works to anyone who cannot perform a transaction for reasons specified in the law or not achieved in the exact time specified by the judge. In this context, reinstatement is a path related to procedural law, and in areas other than procedural law, as a rule, the request for reinstatement will not have an effect.

CONDITIONS

As I mentioned above, our legal system provides an opportunity for judicial subjects who do not perform procedural actions within the time limit to perform such actions in the presence of a number of conditions. As a result of this opportunity provided, the emergence of grievances due to procedural actions that the parties cannot perform for reasons that are not available has been prevented, and the rights of individuals guaranteed by law have been strengthened.

Missed the Deadline for Reasons That Are Not Available
In order for the party to request reinstatement, HMK 95. as stated in the article, first of all, the procedural procedure, which is the basis for the request, should not be carried out for reasons that are not available. The concept of ”reasons that are not available” expressed here should be evaluated subjectively.
In the files that are followed up with a legal representative or lawyer, the legal representative or lawyer will also be able to rely on the reason for reinstatement.
Lack of Opportunity to Apply for Another Legal Way
HMK 95. as stated in the Article, if the same result that is desired to be achieved with the transaction that cannot be done in due time can be achieved through another legal way other than reinstatement, a request for reinstatement cannot be made.
The Application Must Be Made Within the Period
HMK 96. in accordance with the provisions of the article, the request for reinstatement must be made within two weeks from the disappearance of the obstacle.
In first instance and appeal proceedings, it is possible to request reinstatement until the final decision is made at the latest.

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

The request for reinstatement is made with a petition to the authority authorized to examine the procedural procedure that cannot be carried out in due time.

The request for reinstatement does not require postponement of the trial and does not interfere with the execution of the judgment. However, the court examining the request, if it considers the request justified, may decide to postpone the trial or postpone the execution of the judgment, provided that a guarantee is shown.
If necessary, the Court may also decide to postpone the trial without providing a guarantee or to postpone the execution of the judgment.

In the request for reinstatement; full proof is not required, approximate proof is sufficient. In case of acceptance of the request for reinstatement, the Court specifies in its decision which transactions have become invalid. However, transactions that cannot be invalidated by reclamation are also not affected by the request for reinstatement.

The procedural procedure that cannot be carried out in due time must be carried out within the prescribed two-week period in order to request reinstatement.

The expenses incurred due to the reinstatement request are charged to the requesting party.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Judicial Fine I was Scammed, How Can I File a Criminal Complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us