Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
19/08/2022

Request for Dissolution and Liquidation of Ordinary Partnership

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Ordinary Partnership
An ordinary partnership, that is, an individual company that does not have separate assets and a separate legal entity from ordinary company partners. It happens with the Decoupling of two or more real people together. Real people put forward goods or services to achieve the same purpose. Persons who have established an ordinary partnership are obliged to act together with their other partners in legal transactions. The establishment of an ordinary partnership is not subject to any form. In an ordinary partnership that does not have any trade name, there is no need to register a trade or advertise a trade registry. Decisions taken within the company must be taken unanimously.

TERMINATION OF ORDINARY PARTNERSHIP
As a result, the provisions on ordinary partnership, which is a type of partnership based on a trust relationship between the individual element and the partners, will apply to all partnerships that are not included in any of the other types of partnership seen in other laws. Dec.

In this sense, it can be said that the provisions of ordinary partnership will be applied in a wide area. The reasons terminating the ordinary partnership are stated ‘in general’ in Article 639 of the law. In the true sense, ’reasons for termination” is a continuation of the top title, 640. The state specified in the article is not a separate reason for termination. The expiration date stipulated in the Code of Obligations 640 actually specifies how the expiration date in 639/6 will be realized.

PETITION FOR TERMINATION OF ORDINARY PARTNERSHIP
TO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

prosecutor :

attorney :

DEFENDANT :

ADDRESS :

SUBJECT : It consists of the request for termination and liquidation of the Ordinary Partnership.

descriptions :

1- My client’s muri is out of the case … … and the defendant … … has established an ordinary partnership agreement to operate in the construction field on the date of …/…/………………Dec. (October – 1)

2- The total capital of the partnership is … TL. This is … TL. si was brought by my client’s muri, and the defendant joined the partnership … TL. he has put up capital. In addition, my client’s muri has allocated two separate real estate properties of his own to the partnership for free and established an easement right on one of these two real estate properties for a period of years for the benefit of the defendant.

3– Upon the death of the client’s muri … /… /… on the date of (October – 2), the client and the defendant have agreed to continue the ordinary partnership and the defendant to become the managing partner. Paying October 2019, the defendant has not paid a dividend, despite the fact that … a year has passed since this agreement, … /…/… the date and … the notices numbered … journal (ANNEX – 3) were also left unanswered by the defendant. The defendant, who is the managing partner, does not give an account to my client about the course of business, does not pay a dividend despite our request, and does not fulfill his duties and responsibilities.

4- 639 of the Code of Obligations No. 6098. the just cause stated in the article has been realized in terms of the company in which my client and the defendant are partners. Therefore, the ordinary partnership established between the parties has to be Decommissioned by your court based on just cause and to apply to your court for the liquidation of the partnership’s assets.

LEGAL REASONS : 6098 P. K. m. 620 – 639. ingredients

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

1-) Partnership agreement,

2-) Population Registration

3-) Copies of the notice,

4-) Expert Examination

Results and PROMPT : for the reasons stated above, due to the dissolution ordinary partnerships existing between the defendant with my client for the right reasons, … – their share of profit for the year for each year separately … % … rediscount interest calculated by the amount of the run is taken from the defendant to the client, and denounced the trial and the Elimination Provision and ordinary partnerships mahkemenizce costs and attorneys ‘ fees to the defendant respectfully request that it be decided to yukletilm we will.

ADDITIONAL :

1-) Partnership agreement,

2-) Population Registration

3-) Copies of the notice,

4-) One approved power of attorney sample

Plaintiff Attorney

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Voluntary Petition for Injunction Due to Domestic Violence Bona fide 3.Compensation for the Damage Suffered By Our Client, Who Is in the Position of a Person, Due to The Cancellation of the Title Deed to the Immovable Property Subject to The Case, And The Non-Movable Price Paid to the Defendant… TL’s Prompt Request

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us