Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
02/07/2022

Right of Supply Easement

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

What is the Right of Supply Easement?

An easement is known as a right established on an immovable property in favor of another real estate or an individual that provides a limited benefit to the right holder. The easement right can be added to the title deed.

The procedures and principles related to the Right of Easement are included in the Turkish Civil Code. Easement in accordance with the law; Immovable easement in favor of an immovable in favor of a burden that was put on other immovable and immovable property rights of the owners of the installed or installed that provide some powers to refrain from using exploits to endure right of owning the immovable emerges as a compelling use the specific format.

in circular No. 2010/4, the definition of easement was made as follows;

”The rights defined by the Civil Code and other relevant laws are the transactions that must be performed for the display and registration of the relevant immovable property on maps and documents” The transactions made must be approved for compliance with the zoning legislation.

Supply Easement Rights

Supply easements are known as a type of easement established against one real estate in favor of another real estate. (MK.md.779) These rights are also called “Real Estate Easement”.

There are two immovable properties in the supply easement rights. If the easement is established in favor of these, the dominating immovable is the immovable property, if the easement is established against it, it is called hadim immovable.

The easement right of supply is not established in favor of a certain person, but because it is established in favor of a certain real estate, the owner of the beneficiary’s real estate also has the right of easement. In turn, those who subsequently acquire the obliged real estate also have to endure this obligation.

The supply easement is tied to the real estate it was established in favor of. It cannot be transferred separately from it. It is also not possible to make an exception for the transfer of this right in the transfer of real estate.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Cases Where Special Authorization is Required in the Power of Attorney to be Given to the Deputy Usufruct

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Uncategorized @tr

Traffic Accident, Wearing a Helmet Should Be Reduced by 20% – Supreme Court Decision

T.C SUPREME 17.law office MAIN NUMBER:2017/5716 DECISION NO:2018/1495 DECISION DATE: 01/03/2018 COURT : Court of First Instance >> SINCE THERE IS A MUTUAL DEFECT DUE TO A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, NOT WEARING A HELMET, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A MUTUAL DEFECT DISCOUNT OF AT LEAST 20% ACCORDING TO ESTABLISHED APPLICATIONS. At the end of […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us