Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
15/10/2022

Sample Supreme Court Decisions on the Statute of Limitations for Labor Receivables

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Supreme Court Decisions

According to the expert report received by the court, the plaintiff has corrected his case in terms of overwork, bonuses, children, family, education, road, etc. they will receive fuel assistance. The defendant employer has defined the statute of limitations in the written objection petition he has filed against the reform. According to Article 126/3 of the Code of Obligations, lawsuits related to employee wages are subject to a 5-year statute of limitations. Overwork, bonuses, children, family, education, road, etc. are among these types of receivables that they will receive fuel assistance. For this reason, since they will receive overwork, bonuses, children, family, education, road and fuel assistance requested by the reform, the part that is outside the 5 years from the date of reform has expired. The work to be done by the court, reclamation demand and more work that does not expire, bonuses, children, family, education, roads and helps to burn, if necessary by taking additional report from expert witnesses should be determined and the result will occur in accordance with work overtime, bonuses, children, family, education, roads and fuel to take the help of a decision about what should be given. 9. HD. E. 2009/26776 2009/36953 K. 24.12.2009

 

…The plaintiff has proved that he worked too much during the period when he worked as a shipman before 19.11.2003 and that he was paid a voyage premium. The plaintiff has requested 100 TL overwork and 100 TT expedition premium in the lawsuit petition. The case was opened on 09.09.2005. Upon the calculation of the labor receivables by the expert, the plaintiff corrected his case on 17.4.2009. Upon this, the defendant party made a statute of limitations defense. According to both Article 126/3 of the abrogated Code of Obligations No. 818 and Article 147/1 of the Code of Obligations No. 6098, which entered into force on 01.07.2012, lawsuits related to employee wages are subject to a 5-year statute of limitations. It is from such receivables that they will receive overwork and expedition bonuses. For this reason, the part of the overtime work and expedition premium requested by the reform that is outside the 5 years from the date of correction and is more than the amount requested in the lawsuit petition has expired. The refusal of the 100 TL overwork requested by the court in the lawsuit petition and which is not subject to the statute of limitations and the 100 TL expedition bonus should be ruled out, while it should be ruled out. 9. HD. 2011/35376 E. 2013/28177 K. 05.11.2013

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Determination of the Social Security Institution Health Board regarding the Degree of Disability Lease Agreements And The Problem Of Proof

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us