Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
03/09/2022

Supreme Court Decision on the Immunity of Housing

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

T.C.
COURT OF CASSATION DECISION Main No: 2011/6731
Decision No :2012/45397
Decision Date : 07.11.2012

Supreme Court Decision
Communiqué No: 2 – 2009/159584
COURT : Alanya 2. Magistrates ‘ Court
DATE: 20/11/2008
NUMBER: 2008/206(E) and 2008/940(K)

CRIME: Violation of housing immunity
The file was examined and considered as necessary;
1- Defendant H.. Y.. in the examination of the appeals made against the acquittal decision made against him;
Appeals based on the hearing held, the evidence collected, the reason, the opinion and discretion of the judge
because it is not in place, the rejection of the decision as requested to be UPHELD,
2- Defendant S.. K.. as for the appeals made against the acquittal decision issued against him;
The crime of violating the immunity of housing is one of the crimes committed against the freedom of the person and is protected in this crime.
legal benefit; property is the personal freedom of those who do not have the right, but live in housing. In the concrete case, with the participant
due to a dispute arising from a receivable-debt relationship between the accused, the debt of the Decedent
although he transferred the ownership of his house to the defendant with the real estate transfer agreement as collateral in return,
he continued to live in his house, and the defendant did not vacate the participant’s house on the date of the crime and moved
to check, have the locksmith open the door and check the inside and change the lock
in the face of understanding; although the defendant’s action constitutes the crime of violating the immunity of housing,
making an acquittal decision on illegal grounds,
Since the appeals of the participating attorney who required the reversal were seen on the spot in this respect, the judgment
for this reason, it was decided unanimously on the day of 07/11/2012 to break down as a request.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

56 MİLYAR LİRALIK CEZA AFFI HAZIRLIĞI How is the Investigation of the Inheritance Assets of the Deceased Carried Out

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us