T.C. SUPREME 17. Law Department Article No:2010/1770 Decision No :2010/8494 Date of Decision : 19.10.2010 RATION CASE – FOR THE BENEFIT OF A THIRD PARTY DURING FORECLOSURE THE PERSON CLAIMING RATIONS IS AN EMPLOYEE OF A THIRD PARTY – FROM THE MOMENT OF FORECLOSURE BY THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RATIONS MADE WITHIN THE PERIOD SPECIFIED IN […]
T.C. SUPREME 3. Law Department Article No: 2008/6915 Decision No :2008/7602 Date of Decision : 01.05.2008 ALIMONY CASE – WHETHER THE SALARY RECEIVED BY THE DEFENDANT LIVES HUMANELY – THE DEFENDANT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET ALONG HOW TO GET OUT OF POVERTY – THE DEFENDANT’S WORK – REJECTION OF THE CASE MAY NOT […]
T.C. SUPREME 2. Law Department Article No:2013/16048 Decision No: 2013/29319 Date of Decision : 11.12.2013 DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS – THE DURATION OF THE ANSWERS AND EVIDENCE UNREPORTED – REPORTED PRIOR TO THE PRELIMINARY REVIEW HEARING THE NEED TO LISTEN TO WITNESSES – THE VERDICT WITH INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE FACILITY – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION […]
T.C. SUPREME General Assembly of Law Base No :2004/4-249 Decision No: 2004/247 Date of Decision : 05.05.2004 THE CASE FOR THE RETURN OF HOUSEHOLD ITEMS AND TRAPPINGS – WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THE WOMAN CONSIDERING THAT THE TRAPPINGS WERE DONATED TO THE WOMAN – THE DEFENDANT THAT THE WOMAN GAVE THE TRAPPINGS OF HER OWN […]
T.C. SUPREME 12. law office Mainly No:2017/8109 Decision No:2017/14735 Date of Decision: 28.11.2017 COMPENSATION CASE – YOUR OBJECTION TO THE NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE BECOMES A REALITY VIOLATION OF THE LAW – AS OF THE DATE OF APPEAL AGAINST THE NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE A RECEIVABLE OF THE DEBTOR BORN TO THIRD PARTIES – THE APPEAL IS […]
T.C. SUPREME 3. law office Issue No:2015/18286 Decision No:2017/4904 Date of Decision : 06.04.2017 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE: COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE As a result of the trial of the case for material and non-pecuniary compensation between the parties, the decision to dismiss the case was appealed by the […]
T.C. ISTANBUL REGIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 22. law office E. 2017/1042 K. 2017/1201 T. 5.7.2017 * THE APPLICANT’S REASONS AND GROUNDS FOR FILING AN APPEAL MUST BE SHOWN IN HIS PETITION (The Defendant Does Not Fulfill His Obligation to Show Concrete Reasons and Grounds Arising from the Provision of HMK 342/2 /e – HMK 352, […]
T.C. SUPREME 19. law office Base No:2016/3384 Decision No:2016/13901 Date of Decision: 24.10.2016 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT OF First Instance: Court of First Instance DEFENDANTS : 1-… vek. Hunt. … 2- … At the end of the trial of the case of detecting a vice between the parties, for the reasons written […]
…… …. TO THE CRIMINAL COURT THE DECISION TO CAPTURE OBJECTOR (SUSPECT) : T.C. Identity No : address : THE DEFENDER : address : SUBJECT : It consists in the supply of an appeal against the decision to capture. descriptions: 1-) our client …… since ……. He is serving as the headman of the village; […]
…File No WITH THE CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE : …/… WAIVER OF CHICATET doer : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : attorney : ADDRESS : suspect : SUBJECT : Disclaimer of complaint (renunciation) is our statement. LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 144, 158, 5237 Pp. K. m. 73 and related legal regulation. descriptions : 1-) We […]