Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
13/08/2022

The Defect of the Service of the Administration And Therefore The Responsibility for Compensation

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

The Administration’s Service Flaw

The responsibility of the administration based on the defect is called “service defect” in administrative law. A service defect is a deficiency, neglect or delay in the functioning of the administration or the public service it performs. The service defect has a different meaning in administrative law than the “defective liability” cases in private law. Unlike private law, it is a state of defective liability that is objectified and has a distinctive character. In judicial decisions, it is accepted that the service defect occurs in three ways:

Service defect due to the fact that the public service does not function at all,
Service defect due to late processing of the public service,
Service defect due to poor functioning of the public service.
The service defect is related to the organization and functioning of the public service. If the public service is incomplete or poorly performed, or if this activity is not in accordance with the service requirements, the administration is considered to be conducting the public service imperfectly. All personal defects of a public official that occur due to his/her duty while performing his/her duty constitute a service defect within the scope of “duty defect”.

Some examples of service defects that may be the subject of a full judicial compensation case are as follows:

A person was injured because the doctor on duty at the state hospital gave the wrong needle,
A traffic accident that occurred due to negligence or incompleteness in the administrative activities of the administration on road construction, maintenance, operation, ensuring traffic safety,
Military ammunition forgotten in the field exploded, causing death,
The patient in the ambulance died due to a traffic accident caused by the ambulance driver while transporting a patient,
The death of a person infected with the virus due to the fact that the hospital is not sterile,
Death by electrocution caused by leakage laid by the administration.
How to Open a Full Judicial Case?

A full judicial case is a type of administrative case that can be filed in the Council of State, administrative or tax court according to the nature of the administrative action or action. Cases of full jurisdiction can be filed as follows:

They may file a full judicial case directly within the period of filing a lawsuit for cancellation of an administrative act that violates rights.
They may file annulment and full judicial cases together within the period of filing a lawsuit against the administrative procedure that violates their rights.
Upon the decision of the cancellation case filed against the administrative procedure that violates the rights, they may file a full judicial case within the 60-day litigation period starting from the notification of the decision.
They may be sued for damages arising from the execution of an administrative action that violates rights within the period of filing a lawsuit from the date of execution, or within the period of filing these four separate full judicial lawsuits, according to the 11th article of Law No. 2577, which we explain below. the full judicial cases mentioned may be filed by using the application methods provided for in the article.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

In the Receivable Case, The Amount Requested in The Case And The Place of Resolution of the Dispute What is the Case for Annulment of Marriage – In What Cases Is It Canceled

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us