Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
30/04/2022

The Effect of Age Reduction Cases on Insurance and Retirement

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Court decisions on age correction will have their provisions and consequences from the moment the decision is finalized. For this reason, age correction procedures performed after the date of the person’s first entry into the Social Security Institution regarding insurance, as a rule, will not be taken into account in insurance transactions.[2] With the opposite idea, age adjustments made for the first time before becoming insured subject to long-term insurance arms will be considered valid by the SSI. Social insurance and General Health Insurance Law No. 5510, the current regulations issued by the Social Security Agency, “according to the Law No. 5510, 4/1-(A) and 4/1-(b) insured under the allocation of the operations” of the circular on 2011/58 was maintained. However, as a significant difference in this circular, it is seen that the effect of age adjustments on insurance is accepted with a few exceptions. According to the circular:

“Age adjustments of the insured after the date of an occupational accident or occupational disease or when they are subject to long-term insurance arms for the first time will not be taken into account. On the other hand, the date of birth registered for the first time in the population register is; During the renovation of the population register, the new log records, the transport of a National Register in the Census Bureau’s new records, naturalization records, Census Bureau recently in Turkey, is processed incorrectly due to the fact that apart from the will of the insured person of fixes for the population due to errors made by the administration in the case of material aimed at the elimination of correcting these issues is indicated in documenting the decision of the court or when the fix will be based on a new record that is corrected in the registry in question.” These regulations are covered by the mentioned exceptions.

On the other hand, it is not legally possible to eliminate the retirement age by filing an age correction lawsuit. Even if the age change is made, this change will not have an effect on the time that should be expected for retirement. The Constitutional Court’s decision in its 2008/64 Fundamental and 2008/129 Decisions dated 19.11.2008 stating that ”it is not unconstitutional for age adjustments made after being insured for the first time to not be considered valid in retirement accounts” supports this.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Effect of the Age Reduction Case on Military Service – Paid Military Service The Case of Age Augmentation – Reduction

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us