Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
21/05/2022

Things to Know About a Negotiated Divorce

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT A NEGOTIATED DIVORCE

The concept of a negotiated divorce is enshrined in Article 166 of our Turkish Civil Code. article 3. it is arranged in paragraph. According to the article in question, the conditions established for an agreed divorce must be met.

First of all, it should be noted that in order to get an agreed divorce, the spouses must have been married for ez 1 year. Couples who have been married for less than a year must wait for the completion of a year before they can divorce by agreement. Of course, the start date of this 1-year period is the date of the official marriage.

On the other hand, in a negotiated divorce, as the name implies, the parties must fully agree, agree on all the material and moral legal consequences of the divorce and draw up a divorce protocol related to it. In the case of an agreed divorce filed, the parties must be present before the judge, and the conclusions in the submitted divorce protocol must be confirmed in front of the judge, to whom both parties have given their consent. In cases where one of the parties does not appear before the judge, a divorce cannot be decided, and the agreed divorce case is postponed to the other hearing so that the party who does not come can be heard.

If there are children in the marriage union in question, the issue of custody is also important. The protocol drawn up in the case of a negotiated divorce should be drawn up in detail so that there is no doubt in terms of custody.

The judge Decides that the parties are in full agreement on the issues related to the material and moral consequences of the divorce specified in the divorce protocol, and if he decides that the divorce will be achieved in this way after his own assessment, he decides to divorce according to the issues agreed between the parties. As it can be understood, a negotiated divorce is a form of divorce that allows the parties to divorce as soon as possible. However, in order to avoid any loss of rights that may occur in the future, it is useful for the parties to seek help from a lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation on a Fixed and Indefinite-Term Employment Contract Replacing the Surname of the Common Child with the Surname of the Mother

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us