Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
28/07/2022

Voluntary Petition to Delete the Decision to Withdraw the Disclosure of the Provision

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

…. TO THE CRIMINAL COURT
suspect :

THE DEFENDER :

REQUESTED TO BE DELETED

DECISION : … The decision of the Criminal Court …/…/ dated, …/… Main and …/… Decision No.

SUBJECT : … This is our petition, which includes our request to delete the Decision to Withdraw the Disclosure of the Main and Final Decision …/… Decision made by the Criminal Court … /… /… regarding the defendant on the date of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS
1-) As a result of the trial conducted for the crime of the Criminal Court … about our accused client, a decision was made to cancel the announcement of the verdict on the date of /…//.

2-) Article 231 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271. according to the provision of the article; If no new crime has been committed intentionally during the audit period and the obligations related to the probation measure have been complied with, the decision to drop the case is made by eliminating the provision that has been left undisclosed.

3-) Within this framework, our client has not committed any crimes during the five-year period, as well as has complied with the obligations related to the probation measure, and has been obliged to contact your Court to have the decision to withdraw the disclosure of the provision deleted.

LEGAL REASONS : 5271 P. K. m. 231, 232.

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: For the reasons we have explained above, we request by proxy on behalf of our client that the decision to withdraw the disclosure of the dated/// decision issued by the Criminal Court be deleted. …/ …/ …

Defense of the Accused

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Detection of an Attack Via the Internet And A Request For the Takedown of Its Content Appeal against the Decision to Block Access to the Website

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us