Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
11/06/2022

Where Does the Enforcement Proceedings Open

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

A person who wants to start enforcement proceedings can initiate enforcement proceedings by contacting the Enforcement Directorate with a file containing the amount of receivables. The creditor must have a court decision in hand for Ilamlım enforcement proceedings. In this respect, ilamlımlı enforcement is separated from ilamlız enforcement. There is no authorization problem in continuous follow-ups. Ilamli enforcement proceedings are proceedings that can be opened all over Turkey as specified in the law, that is, all Enforcement Directorates are authorized. For this reason, the debtor will not appeal due to lack of authority. It is possible to initiate a follow-up in any enforcement agency. The time-out period for requesting follow-up in Ilamli execution is 10 years.

Ilamsiz enforcement proceedings can be opened only in authorized enforcement agencies. As a rule, the authorized body in this enforcement proceedings is the enforcement agency located in the place of settlement of the debtor. However, if it is a question that he will receive money or collateral arising from the contract, the enforcement directorate at the place of performance of the contract becomes the authorized body. If the parties have agreed in advance on the competent enforcement agency, it will be mandatory to comply with this situation.

According to the nature of the enforcement proceedings to be conducted, documents should be prepared and, if necessary, a court decision should be taken. The fee that must be deposited after that is deposited by the creditor and it becomes possible to initiate enforcement proceedings by going to the relevant Enforcement Directorate. It is possible to carry out these processes not only by the creditor himself, but also by the representation of a lawyer himself. In addition, it is highly recommended that the authorized enforcement agency be determined together with an expert lawyer in order to avoid loss of rights.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Come and Get It If You Can Get It – Supreme Court Decision A Complaint about a Defamation Case

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us