Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
13/08/2022

Who Does the Wedding Jewelry Belong To

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

Who Does the Wedding Jewelry Belong To?

No matter which spouse is worn during the wedding, all jewelry (bracelet, quarter, full, etc. all gold), belongs to the woman. Of the jewelry worn by a man, only those that may be specific to a man’s use (for example, a man’s cufflink) belong to a man. All other jewelry worn at the wedding belongs to the woman, regardless of which partner is worn by whom.

How to Open a Case for Wedding Jewelry?

Claims related to wedding jewelry can be put forward together with the divorce case, as well as in the form of filing a separate lawsuit after the finalization of the divorce case.

It is useful to open the case related to wedding jewelry in the form of a regular (gradual) lawsuit. In other words, if possible, the return of the jewelry items in kind, if not possible, the decision to pay the price of the jewelry should be requested. For example, in the petition for the case, the request should be made as follows:

“I demand that it be decided to return the jewelry worn at the wedding, consisting of 8 bracelets, 17 full gold, 42 quarter gold, and if it is not possible to return it in kind, the price will be paid together with legal interest.”

Pay October If it is not possible to return or return the wedding jewelry in kind, the demand for payment of the cost is an independent request that is not an attachment to the divorce. Therefore, when trappings are requested in a divorce case, a relative fee must be paid separately related to this request.

Are Wedding Jewelry Included in the Division of Property in Case of Divorce?

Since wedding jewelry is considered a woman’s personal property, it cannot be included in the calculation of property sharing in divorce.

Spending wedding jewelry on common needs or wedding expenses within the marriage, paying off a man’s debt with jewelry, etc. even if it is disposed of for reasons such as divorce, the woman has the right to demand wedding jewelry from the male spouse. If a woman has given her wedding jewelry to a man of her free will on the condition that it cannot be “returned”, she can no longer ask for the jewelry back. However, the man has to prove that the jewelry was given to him by the woman in order not to be returned.

What is the Wedding Jewelry Lawsuit/Statute of Limitations Period?

If the wedding jewelry is in the possession of the defendant, that is, if the wedding jewelry is present during the case, the lawsuit filed for the return of the same is called a “ration lawsuit”. Filing a ration lawsuit regarding the exact return of the jewelry is not subject to any statute of limitations, the lawsuit can be filed at any time.

If the wedding jewelry was not available at the time of opening the case and the plaintiff requested the price because it is not possible to return the jewelry in kind, the period for filing a lawsuit is 10 years. Because, while the demand for the return of the jewelry is a ration case that is not subject to the statute of limitations, the demand for paying the price is a compensation case subject to the statute of limitations of 10 years.

If the price of the jewelry is requested, the 10-year statute of limitations period begins from the finalization of the divorce case.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

What is the Case for Annulment of Marriage – In What Cases Is It Canceled Consumer Court

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us