Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
03/09/2022

Appeal Against the Decision on the Rejection of the Request for Legal Aid

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

……….. TO THE JUDGES OF THE COURT

 

 

OBJECTOR :

TURKISH ID NUMBER :

address :

SUBJECT : It includes our objections against the decision on the rejection of our request for legal aid and consists of the submission of our petition.

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1-) …/…/… from the court on the date the request was made through the submission of documents in the appendix, whether judicial assistance; …/…/… dated with the decision of the law, “judicial or those who are partially or fully deprived of the ability to pay the following costs” are not within the scope of legal aid to bet that my request was rejected.

 

October pay the trial or follow-up expenses partially or completely within the framework of the documents I have submitted in the annex to the petition, it is obvious that I lack the ability to follow the case partially or completely, and if my request for legal aid is not accepted, there is an explanation that I will have difficulty following the case.

 

3-) For all these reasons, my objection to the rejection of my request for legal aid has been accepted and the obligation to request the re-evaluation of my request has arisen with this petition.

 

LEGAL REASONS : 6100 p. K. m. 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340.

 

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

Legal aid request documents
…. Court decision

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: For the reasons we have explained above, I respectfully request that my objection to the rejection of my request for legal aid be accepted and my request be re-evaluated. …/ …/ …

 

ADDITIONAL :

Legal aid request documents
…. Court decision

 

Objector

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Request for Termination and Liquidation of Ordinary Partnership Divorce Petition with Legal Aid Request

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us