Menu
En iyi Manavgat Avukatı
  • Anasayfa
  • Biz
  • İletişim
  • Blog
Close Menu
03/09/2022

Request for Termination and Liquidation of Ordinary Partnership

Rabia Ekşi Uncategorized @tr alanya, antalya, law, lawyer, mahmutlar

… TO THE JUDGE OF THE CIVIL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE,

 

PLAINTIFF: (TC No):

address :

attorney :

address :

DEFENDANT :

ADDRESS :

SUBJECT : The termination and liquidation of the Ordinary Partnership includes our request and consists of our petition.

 

OUR EXPLANATIONS

1- My client’s muri is out of the case … … and the defendant … … an ordinary partnership agreement has been established to operate in the field of poultry farming (poultry farm) on the date of …/…/………………Dec.

2-The total capital of the partnership is … TL. and this is … TL. si was brought by my client’s muri, and the defendant joined the partnership … TL. he has put up capital. In addition, my client’s muri ……has allocated two separate real estate properties of his own to the partnership for free and has established an easement on one of these two real estate properties for the benefit of the defendant … for a period of years.

3-Upon the death of the client’s muri … /… /… on the date of the client’s death, the client and the defendant agreed to continue the ordinary partnership and become the administrative partner of the defendant. Although … a year has passed since this agreement, the defendant has not paid a dividend, …/… /… the date and …journal notices have also been left unanswered by the defendant. The defendant, who is the managing partner, does not give my client an account of how things are, the earnings situation, does not pay dividends despite our request, and does not fulfill his duties and responsibilities.

4- 639 of the Code of Obligations No. 6098. the just cause stated in the article has been realized in terms of the company in which my client and the defendant are partners. Although not officially, the ordinary partnership has actually already ended. Therefore, it has been necessary to apply to your court for the Decommissioning of the ordinary partnership established between the parties by your court based on just cause and for the liquidation of the partnership’s assets.

 

LEGAL REASONS :6098 P. K. m. 620 – 639. ingredients

LEGAL EVIDENCE :

1-) Partnership agreement,

2-) Population Registration

3-) Copies of the notice,

4-) Expert Examination

 

Results and PROMPT :for the reasons stated above, due to the dissolution ordinary partnerships existing between the defendant with my client for the right reasons, … – their share of profit for the year for each year separately … % … rediscount interest calculated by the amount of the run is taken from the defendant to the client, and denounced the trial and the Elimination Provision and ordinary partnerships mahkemenizce costs and attorneys ‘ fees to the defendant decided to yukletilm bilvekale that we require.

Plaintiff Attorney

Lawyer.

You can read our articles and petition examples by clicking here.

The Responsibility of the Administration in Secret Icing – Supreme Court Decision Appeal Against the Decision on the Rejection of the Request for Legal Aid

Related Posts

Uncategorized @tr

Anayasa Mahkemesi 4 sözleşmeli personel alacak

Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında istihdam edilmek üzere, yapılacak sözlü sınav esas alınmak suretiyle, Destek Personeli (Temizlik Görevlisi) pozisyonu için toplam 4 (dört) sözleşmeli personel alınacak. Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığından: 4 (DÖRT) SÖZLEŞMELİ PERSONEL ALIMI HAKKINDA DUYURU Anayasa Mahkemesi Başkanlığı (Başkanlık) merkez teşkilatında 657 sayılı Devlet Memurları Kanunu’nun 4 üncü maddesinin (B) fıkrasına göre istihdam […]

Uncategorized @tr

TBB BAŞKANI SAĞKAN 5 NİSAN AVUKATLAR GÜNÜNDE KONUŞMA YAPTI

Avukatlar, Türkiye Barolar Birliği’nin öncülüğünde 5 Nisan Avukatlar Günü’nde Ankara’da ‘Savunmanın Bağımsızlığı ve Hukuka Saygı’ yürüyüşü yaptı. Barolar adına konuşma yapan Türkiye Barolar Birliği Başkanı Av. R. Erinç Sağkan, “Biz bugün hukuk devletini savunmak için, yargı bağımsızlığını savunmak için buradayız. Bu ses susturulamaz” dedi. “İSTANBUL BAROSU, HUKUKA AYKIRI YARGI KARARLARIYLA GÖREVİNDEN UZAKLAŞTIRILMAK İSTENİYOR” Anıtpark’ta bir […]

Uncategorized @tr

Determination and Recommendations regarding the Main Procedural Problems in Terms of Earthquake-Related Civil Cases

“It is Not Possible to Get Rid of the Responsibility of Those Responsible by Obscuring the Evidence of the Earthquake, On the Contrary, Their Responsibilities Increase” Prof. Dr. Muhammet Özekes (12.02.2023) If the CCP and procedural rules can be applied consciously, correctly and quickly, the judiciary can get out of this earthquake without being in […]

Uncategorized @tr

The Decision of the Council of State that the Consumer Bank Cannot Receive Account Operating Fees

COUNCIL OF STATE 15. apartment Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Problems Association Acting Director : Av… Respondent : Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Acting Director : Av… Summary of the Case: Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedures and Principles regarding Fees to be Collected from Financial Consumers, which entered into force […]

Uncategorized @tr

Negative Detection Case Based on the Guarantee Bond Claim, Exchange Monitoring Supreme Court Decision

T.C. SUPREME 19. law office MAIN NUMBER: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 >> FOREIGN EXCHANGE MONITORING, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE BILL IS A SECURITY BILL, BURDEN OF PROOF AND STATE OF EVIDENCE 6100/m.222/5 6102/m.64 SUMMARY: The case is related to the request for negative determination. The plaintiff has […]

Back To Top
manavgat avukat

İletişim:

+905425139898

+902425139898

info@antalya.law

Adres

Hacet Mahallesi, Canlılar Sokak,
Avukatlar İş Merkezi, No: 7, Daire: 2-3
Alanya / Antalya

Copyright © 2020 Aşıkoğlu Hukuk ™ Aşıkoğlu Uluslararası Hukuk Bürosu, Her Hakkı Saklıdır

WhatsApp us